2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-014-0663-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Appraising the accuracy of GIS-based Multi-criteria decision making technique for delineation of Groundwater potential zones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several statistical methods can also be adopted for groundwater mapping where adequate information on different influencing parameters to groundwater accumulation and movement are available. These include frequency ratio (Davoodi et al 2013), multi-criteria decision evaluation (Murthy and Mamo 2009;Kumar et al 2014), logistic regression model (Ozdemir 2011), weights-of-evidence model (Ozdemir 2011;Pourtaghi and Pourghasemi 2014), random forest model (Rahmati et al 2016Naghibi et al 2016, maximum entropy model (Rahmati et al 2016), boosted regression tree (Naghibi et al 2016;Naghibi and Pourghasemi 2015), classification and regression tree (Naghibi et al 2016), multivariate adaptive regression spline model (Zabihi et al 2016), certainty factor model (Zabihi et al 2016), evidential belief function (Pourghasemi and Beheshtirad 2015;Naghibi and Pourghasemi 2015), and generalized linear model (Naghibi and Pourghasemi 2015). These information are lacking in many third world country hence proper understanding of hydrogeological characteristics for successful exploitation of groundwater in basement areas depend largely on geophysical methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several statistical methods can also be adopted for groundwater mapping where adequate information on different influencing parameters to groundwater accumulation and movement are available. These include frequency ratio (Davoodi et al 2013), multi-criteria decision evaluation (Murthy and Mamo 2009;Kumar et al 2014), logistic regression model (Ozdemir 2011), weights-of-evidence model (Ozdemir 2011;Pourtaghi and Pourghasemi 2014), random forest model (Rahmati et al 2016Naghibi et al 2016, maximum entropy model (Rahmati et al 2016), boosted regression tree (Naghibi et al 2016;Naghibi and Pourghasemi 2015), classification and regression tree (Naghibi et al 2016), multivariate adaptive regression spline model (Zabihi et al 2016), certainty factor model (Zabihi et al 2016), evidential belief function (Pourghasemi and Beheshtirad 2015;Naghibi and Pourghasemi 2015), and generalized linear model (Naghibi and Pourghasemi 2015). These information are lacking in many third world country hence proper understanding of hydrogeological characteristics for successful exploitation of groundwater in basement areas depend largely on geophysical methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the cur rent study, the soil has a mi nor ef fect on ground wa ter po ten tial. Kumar et al (2014) found a dif fer ent weighted rat ing for the influ enc ing fac tors in the Durg dis trict, In dia. The same con clusion was re ported by Machiwal et al (2011) in a semi-arid region in In dia.…”
Section: Map Of Groundwater Potential Zonesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The relationship between the different thematic layers has been derived using AHP and relationship between their various classes. The methodology for deriving the weights to the thematic layers and their corresponding classes using AHP involves the following steps (Saaty 1999(Saaty , 2004Agarwal et al 2013;Kumar et al 2014). …”
Section: Deriving the Weights Using Ahpmentioning
confidence: 99%