Appraising Cross-National Income Inequality Databases: An Introduction

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may D I S C U S S I O N P A P E R S E R I E ABSTRACTAppraising Cross-National Income Inequality Databases: An Introduction *In response to a growing interest in comparing inequality levels and trends across countries, a number of cross-national inequality databases are now available. These databases differ considerably in purpose, coverage, data sources, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and quality of documentation. A special issue of the Journal of Economic Inequality, which this paper introduces, is devoted to an assessment of the merits and shortcomings of eight such databases. Five of these sets are microdata-based: CEPALSTAT, Income Distribution Database (IDD), LIS, PovcalNet, and Socio-Economic Database for Latin America and the Caribbean (SEDLAC). Two are based on secondary sources: "All the Ginis" (ATG) and the World Income Inequality Database (WIID); and one is generated entirely through multipleimputation methods: the Standardized World Income Inequality Database (SWIID). Although there is much agreement across these databases, there is also a non-trivial share of country/year cells for which substantial discrepancies exist. In some cases, different databases would lead users to radically different conclusions about inequality dynamics in certain countries and periods. The methodological differences that lead to these discrepancies often appear to be driven by a fundamental trade-off between a wish for broader coverage on the one hand, and for greater comparability on the other. These differences across databases place considerable responsibility on both producers and users: on the former, to better document and explain their assumptions and procedures, and on the latter, to understand the data they are using, rather than merely taking them as true because available. 2A number of databases containing summary inequality statistics for multiple countries over many years are now publicly available. These cross-national inequality databases are being used by researchers, with increasing frequency, to document global or regional trends (e.g. Atkinson and Bourguignon, 2014;Atkinson, 2015;and Piketty, 2014), as well as by scholars interested in including inequality measures in cross-country regression analyses, either as dependent or independent variables (e.g. Acemoglu et al., 2013;and Ostry et al., 2014).Yet, these different databases are often designed for different purposes, and are constructed in very diffe...

Four Levers of Redistribution: The Impact of Tax and Transfer Systems on Inequality Reduction

“…The data includes different types of household income, including individual earnings, monetary transfers, direct taxes, employee contributions, and household consumption. LIS data have become the benchmark for the analysis of the redistributive impacts of tax and transfer systems (Ferreira et al ., ). The data are comprehensive, comparable, and measure the ex post effect of the transfer system—since the recipient reports the amount of transfers actually received rather than the amount the government intends to provide.…”

Microfinance and income inequality: New macrolevel evidence

“…5 Cornia (2014) summarizes the main determinants of a country's inequality in five dimensions or groups of variables: macroeconomic conditions and macrostability, human capital and labor market, social expenditure and redistribution, external redistribution process and financial flows, and political regimes. 6 Available at: https://www.wider.unu.edu/project/wiid---world-income-inequality-database 7 Available at: http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/all-the-ginis 8 Available at: http://myweb.uiowa.edu/fsolt/swiid/swiid.html 9 See Ferreira, Lustig, and Teles (2015) for a description of the characteristics and limitations of each database. 10 Since SWIID (Solt, 2009) and All the Ginis (Milanovic, 2014) correlate highly, we performed all of the empirical analysis with SWIID data.…”

“… See Ferreira, Lustig, and Teles () for a description of the characteristics and limitations of each database. …”

And yet it Moves: The Agenda against Inequalities in the G7 and G20

“…Even if there seems to be a consensus that within-country income inequality has risen substantially, notably in most wealthy economies 2 (Alvaredo et al, 2017;Atkinson, 2015;Bourguignon, 2015;Milanovic, 2016;Piketty, 2014), data gaps, lack of data harmonization and differences in the definition of inequality indexes may lead to different (and possibly biased) conclusions (Ferreira and Lustig, 2015), ultimately preventing the formation of a shared understanding on the different dimensions of inequality and a coherent approach to tackling them. 3 The concept of hidden inequality emerges from the economic theory on inequality (Cobham et al, 2016a(Cobham et al, , 2016bSchutz, 1951).…”