2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.102802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Appraisal of surface preparation in adhesive bonding of additive manufactured substrates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known that plasma cleaning can increase the polarity of steel surface and thus surface energy. 39–41 The increase in polarity, combined with the smoothness of surface, makes steel an ideal substrate for most adhesives. This can be seen with adhesion strength of over 2.0 MPa for many of the adhesives with lignin contents at 50 wt% and 75 wt%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that plasma cleaning can increase the polarity of steel surface and thus surface energy. 39–41 The increase in polarity, combined with the smoothness of surface, makes steel an ideal substrate for most adhesives. This can be seen with adhesion strength of over 2.0 MPa for many of the adhesives with lignin contents at 50 wt% and 75 wt%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under normal circumstances, the adhesive will undergo a series of physical and chemical changes after absorbing water, such as swelling, softening, plasticizing, microcracking, degradation, and so forth, which reduces the mechanical properties and durability and is also the main reason for the decline in bonding performance. [ 29 ] By applying the modified Bis‐GMA in the adhesive, the water absorption value and solubility value of the adhesive are significantly reduced, and a good solution can be put forward to the above‐mentioned clinical use problems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the adhesive is highly hydrophilic, it will absorb the moisture in the saliva, resulting in a series of physical changes such as swelling, softening, plasticizing, microcracking, and degradation inside the adhesive, which will affect the long‐term service of the adhesive performance. [ 29 ] If the adhesive is too hydrophobic, it cannot bond well with the dentin, reducing the bonding strength. [ 30 ] Therefore, in this experiment, the contact angle of the adhesive before and after the modification of Bis‐GMA was tested by a contact angle tester (XWK‐705B, SIVAKA, China).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanical property of the specified adhesive is given in Table 1. As an epoxy-based polymer adhesive, LOCTITE EA 9466 exhibits higher tensile modulus and strength in comparison to Polyurethane polymer and Silane-modified polymer-based adhesives [18].…”
Section: Figure 1 Schematic Illustration Of Filamentmentioning
confidence: 99%