1979
DOI: 10.1017/s0001566000009193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Appraisal of Parental Bias in Twin Studies.Ascribed Zygosity and IQ Differences in Twins

Abstract: A criticism of twin studies has been that the difference between the behavioral similarities of identical and fraternal twins is largely created by parental influences based on their perception of the twins' zygosity. This issue is examined for differences in the IQ scores found within pairs classified by parents and bloodtyping. The systematic differences in IQ scores could be attributed to zygosity classified by bloodtyping rather than by parental belief. The available evidence indicates that the twin method… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with some (Matheny, 1979;Lytton, 1977), but not other (Scarr, 1968;Munsinger and Douglass, 1976), reports the disagreements between self-reported and assigned zygosity were not symmetrical in this sample; many more MZ twins considered themselves to be DZ than vice versa. In an attempt to understand this finding, we compared the reasons given for belief about zygosity in MZ twins where both considered themselves DZ vs. twins who were, in our judgment, both correct in considering themselves either MZ or DZ (Table III).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Consistent with some (Matheny, 1979;Lytton, 1977), but not other (Scarr, 1968;Munsinger and Douglass, 1976), reports the disagreements between self-reported and assigned zygosity were not symmetrical in this sample; many more MZ twins considered themselves to be DZ than vice versa. In an attempt to understand this finding, we compared the reasons given for belief about zygosity in MZ twins where both considered themselves DZ vs. twins who were, in our judgment, both correct in considering themselves either MZ or DZ (Table III).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In a population-based sample of female-female adult twin pairs, self-reported zygosity in both members of the twin pair agreed with assigned zygosity in about 85% of pairs. This is a somewhat higher rate than in most previous reports (Loehlin and Nichols, 1976;Scarf, 1968;Scarr and CarterSaltzman, 1979;Matheny, 1979;Munsinger and Douglass, 1976). However, these studies examined younger twins and often asked the parents of the twins rather than the twins themselves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such an effect could arise when parents and others know that MZ twins are genetically identical and on the basis of that knowledge treat them identically, even when the twins do not want or deserve such similar treatment. Studies of twins whose zygosity has been mistaken by their parents indicate, however, that parental beliefs regarding their twins' zygosity have no effect on the similarity of their twins' personalities or abilities (19)(20)(21)(22). For example, Scarr & Carter-Saltzman (22) found that MZs misdiagnosed as DZs were as similar as correctly diagnosed MZs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…assumption by zygosity suggest that it holds for many traits (42)(43)(44). In addition, a lack of assortative mating by phenotype is typically assumed.…”
Section: Gene 3 Environment Interaction Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%