1993
DOI: 10.1080/02699939308409189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Appraisal components, core relational themes, and the emotions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

34
773
9
18

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 973 publications
(834 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
34
773
9
18
Order By: Relevance
“…The lexicographical definitions also associate regret with distress or longing for something lost (OED, 1991) or with "a sense of loss or feeling of having done wrong" (Chambers, 1998), which suggests that regret has at least two distinct causes; loss and wrongdoing. This view is consistent with some cognitive approaches to emotion which show loss to be a core feature of sadness, and self-blame to be the core feature of guilt (Smith & Lazarus, 1993). It may be then that two broad categories of regret might be those of a pragmatic nature to do with lost opportunities, and those that reflect on the character through interpersonal or intrapersonal wrongdoing.…”
Section: Regret and Other Emotionssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The lexicographical definitions also associate regret with distress or longing for something lost (OED, 1991) or with "a sense of loss or feeling of having done wrong" (Chambers, 1998), which suggests that regret has at least two distinct causes; loss and wrongdoing. This view is consistent with some cognitive approaches to emotion which show loss to be a core feature of sadness, and self-blame to be the core feature of guilt (Smith & Lazarus, 1993). It may be then that two broad categories of regret might be those of a pragmatic nature to do with lost opportunities, and those that reflect on the character through interpersonal or intrapersonal wrongdoing.…”
Section: Regret and Other Emotionssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…These findings help us understand how a woman may have abstract knowledge about the general risk to women of sexual aggression by an acquaintance, but appraise her own risk as low and her individual capacity to handle a threat as high (Cue & George, 1995;Norris, Nurius, & Graham, 1995; relative to more general stress and coping, see Smith & Lazarus, 1993). Interventions designed to increase perceived susceptibility by decreasing optimism, positive self-regard, and perceived control run the risk of eroding a significant mental health asset and fostering a dangerous combination of high fear and low perceived self-efficacy.…”
Section: Optimistic Bias and Risk Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In examinations of cognitive mediation of coping responses to threat, two sets of cognitive processes have been identified: (a) primary appraisals, in which an event is judged to pose personal threat and the nature of that threat and (b) secondary appraisals, which invoke judgments of one's capacity to deal with the identified threat (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984;Smith & Lazarus, 1990). Appraisals stem in part from the individual's current predominant goals and beliefs, and result in interpretations and emotional states that mobilize coping in a manner consistent with those interpretations and emotions (Smith & Lazarus, 1993).…”
Section: Perspective Differences: Experts and Epidemiology Versus Laymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 When people think about a situation they appraise it for personal relevance. Structural theories of emotion 20 (p.140) postulate that the result of the appraisal is a point in a multi-dimensional space that is uniquely associated with a particular emotion.…”
Section: Emotions Decision-making and Ethicsmentioning
confidence: 99%