1998
DOI: 10.1051/forest:19980602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apports d'un modèle démographique plurispécifique pour l'étude des relations diversité / dynamique en forêt tropicale guyanaise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study showed that the five species group classification of Favrichon (1998) was predictive of the fate of two pooled groups after disturbance, but did not help to predict species fate in undisturbed plots. The two pooled groups were: the heliophilous species (H + P) and the mid to strongly shade-tolerant species (ST + T + MT).…”
Section: Practical Consequences For Modellers and Managerscontrasting
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our study showed that the five species group classification of Favrichon (1998) was predictive of the fate of two pooled groups after disturbance, but did not help to predict species fate in undisturbed plots. The two pooled groups were: the heliophilous species (H + P) and the mid to strongly shade-tolerant species (ST + T + MT).…”
Section: Practical Consequences For Modellers and Managerscontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…The 53 species were distributed between five functional groups produced from a clustering analysis of size and dynamic variables regarding 123 species, including our set of species (Favrichon 1994(Favrichon , 1998 Table 2). Although they were objective data driven groups, they showed relevant differences in life history traits such as dispersal mode, seed size and wood density (Favrichon 1994).…”
Section: Studied Species and Functional Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A continuum of trait values, rather than distinct classes, is usually found and the chance to find a single clustering of species based on several ecological traits is small. However, classifications combining at least two ecological axes have been proposed [22,24,39,55]. These axes can be characterised by the dynamic of the forest * Corresponding author: damien.bonal@kourou.cirad.fr (tree growth, mortality and recruitment) and the morphology of trees (height and maximal diameter of the trees) and are pertinent to understand ecosystem processes [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%