Multidiscip Cancer Investig 2018
DOI: 10.30699/acadpub.mci.2.2.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying Two Computational Classification Methods to Predict the Risk of Breast Cancer: A Comparative Study

Abstract: Introduction: Lack of a proper method for early detection and diagnostic errors in medicine are some fundamental problems in treating cancer. Data analysis techniques may significantly help early diagnosis. The current study aimed at applying and evaluating neural networks and decision tree algorithm on breast cancer patients' data for early cancer prediction. Methods: In the current study, data from Breast Cancer Research Cancer (BCRC), ACE-CR (the Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research) were use… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings of a study by Atashi et al [ 65 ] conducted on a database with 4004 records, including demographic risk factors showed the higher performance of the neural network (sensitivity= %80.9, specificity= %99.8, accuracy= %62.8) compared to other approaches, such as C5.0. Mosayebi et al study [ 66 ] was conducted on a database with 5471 records, including demographic and laboratory features reported for C.50 (accuracy 82%, sensitivity 86%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings of a study by Atashi et al [ 65 ] conducted on a database with 4004 records, including demographic risk factors showed the higher performance of the neural network (sensitivity= %80.9, specificity= %99.8, accuracy= %62.8) compared to other approaches, such as C5.0. Mosayebi et al study [ 66 ] was conducted on a database with 5471 records, including demographic and laboratory features reported for C.50 (accuracy 82%, sensitivity 86%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%