2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying the UTAUT model to explain the students' acceptance of an early warning system in Higher Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
26
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Performance expectations and effort expectations in robotics education positively and directly affect teachers' acceptance (Hl, H2), i.e., the higher performance expectations (PE) or effort expectations (EE) that teachers place on robotics education, the stronger their acceptance of robotics education. This conclusion is not only consistent with the original UTAUT model, but also with earlier research findings (Almaiah et al, 2019 ; Raffaghelli et al, 2022 ). Analysis of the paths revealed that performance expectations (path coefficient of 0.117) had a slightly stronger effect on acceptance than effort expectations (path coefficient of 0.101), generally speaking, teachers' willingness to attempt to introduce a new teaching model into their actual classrooms will heavily consider whether the model contributes to their performance levels.…”
Section: Research Results and Analysissupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Performance expectations and effort expectations in robotics education positively and directly affect teachers' acceptance (Hl, H2), i.e., the higher performance expectations (PE) or effort expectations (EE) that teachers place on robotics education, the stronger their acceptance of robotics education. This conclusion is not only consistent with the original UTAUT model, but also with earlier research findings (Almaiah et al, 2019 ; Raffaghelli et al, 2022 ). Analysis of the paths revealed that performance expectations (path coefficient of 0.117) had a slightly stronger effect on acceptance than effort expectations (path coefficient of 0.101), generally speaking, teachers' willingness to attempt to introduce a new teaching model into their actual classrooms will heavily consider whether the model contributes to their performance levels.…”
Section: Research Results and Analysissupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These effects nevertheless become insignificant when observed under voluntary conditions. Based on various reports, SI was found to have a positive and significant effect on a person's and students' intentions to ordinarily and educationally use technology-based media, respectively [53,74,75]. This was in line with other previous studies, where SI affected students towards using video-based learning media [35].…”
Section: Social Influence (Si)supporting
confidence: 86%
“…(4) Facilitating Conditions (FCs) Facilitating Conditions are the teacher's complete perception of the various technical support conditions needed for the successful use of information technology (Venkatesh et al, 2003). According to several previous reviews, significant positive effects of FCs were observed on UB and BI (Chao, 2019;Alowayr, 2021;Raffaghelli et al, 2022). Based on these results, this variable is the perception of frontline K-12 teachers in using IWB, regarding the convenience of use, equipment and technical support, and after-sale services, such as networking facilities and skills training.…”
Section: The Situation Of Interactive Whiteboard In Remote and Rural ...mentioning
confidence: 99%