2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.07.120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying the Triad method in a risk assessment of a former surface treatment and metal industry site

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, in an attempt to achieve a cost-effective process, the ERA considers three subsequent tiers of investigation: cheaper and quicker tests are best suited for Tier 1 (screening stage), whereas more specific and complicated tests are progressively used in subsequent Tiers 2 (refining) and 3 (detailing). There are other soil ERA works which include one or more aspects of our TRIAD-tiered approach (e.g., Dagnino et al, 2008;Ribé et al, 2012;Sorvari et al, 2013) but, to the extent of our knowledge, no ERA study considers in the same way all of the aspects covered here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, in an attempt to achieve a cost-effective process, the ERA considers three subsequent tiers of investigation: cheaper and quicker tests are best suited for Tier 1 (screening stage), whereas more specific and complicated tests are progressively used in subsequent Tiers 2 (refining) and 3 (detailing). There are other soil ERA works which include one or more aspects of our TRIAD-tiered approach (e.g., Dagnino et al, 2008;Ribé et al, 2012;Sorvari et al, 2013) but, to the extent of our knowledge, no ERA study considers in the same way all of the aspects covered here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sediment quality triad (from now on referred to as the triad) approach considers 3 lines of site‐specific evidence: chemical characterization (e.g., total concentration, bioavailable concentration, bioaccumulation), toxicology (e.g., bioassay of the sediment, biomarkers), and in situ parameters (e.g., benthic community structure, field observations of vegetation; Chapman ; Jensen and Mesman ; Swartjes et al ). To integrate the results of the different lines of evidences and obtain a triad value for each site, we used the following (Ribé et al ): Triadeffectvalue= 1((1LoECHEM)·(1LoEBIO)·(1LoEECO))13 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В ходе этих исследований изучено содержание ряда тяжелых металлов (ТМ) -Mn, Cr, Pb, Zn, Cd, Cu, Ba, Co, Sr, Fe, Sc, Hg и Ni) в компонентах окружающей среды -воде, донных отложениях, почвах и растениях. Принятый комплекс методов биоиндикации основан на существующих представлениях об уровнях организации живого вещества (ген -клетка -орган -вид -популяция -сообщество) и согласуется с мнением о необходимости проведения сопряженного анализа с абиотическими показателями среды обитания и применения в качестве тест-культур для экспрессных анализов представителей трех основных звеньев трофической цепи биогеоценозов: продуцентов, консументов, редуцентов Terekhova, 2011;Ribe, 2012).…”
Section: материалы и методыunclassified
“…Contemporary Problems of Ecology 11(1), 99-110. Ribe, V., Auleniusa, E., Nehrenheima, M., Martellb, U., Odlarea, M., 2012. Applying the triad method in a risk assessment and metal industry site.…”
Section: результаты и обсуждениеmentioning
confidence: 99%