Applying the Theoretical Domains Framework to understand knowledge broker decisions in selecting evidence for knowledge translation in low- and middle-income countries

Abstract

Background Health-related organisations disseminate an abundance of clinical and implementation evidence that has potential to improve health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), but little is known about what influences a user decision to select particular evidence for action. Knowledge brokers (KBs) play a part as intermediaries supporting evidence-informed health policy and practice by selecting and synthesising evidence for research users, and therefore understanding the basis for KB decisions, can help inform knowledge translation strategies. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), a synthesis of psychological theories, was selected as a promising analysis approach because of its widespread use in identifying influences on decisions to act on evidence-based healthcare guidelines. This study explored its application in the context of KB decisions regarding evidence for use in LMICs. Methods The study analysed data collected from participants of a 2015 global maternal and newborn health conference in Mexico. A total of 324 conference participants from 56 countries completed an online survey and 20 from 15 countries were interviewed about evidence use and sharing after the conference. TDF domains and constructs were retrospectively applied and adapted during coding of qualitative data to enhance understanding of the KB decision process in selecting evidence for action. Results Application of the TDF involved challenges related to overlapping constructs, retrospective use, and complexities of global health settings and relevant knowledge. Codes needed to be added or adapted to account for how KBs’ internal reflections on external factors influenced their actions in selecting evidence to share and use, and the decisions they made during the process. Four themes of the rationale for changing the TDF were identified during analysis, namely Influences from Beyond the Organisation, Knowledge Selection as a Process, Access and Packaging of Knowledge, and Fit for Use. Conclusions Theories of individual behaviour, such as those in the TDF, can enhance understanding of the decisions made by actors such as KBs along dissemination and knowledge translation pathways. Understanding how KBs reflect on evidence and interact with their environment has the potential for improving global dissemination efforts and LMIC-to-LMIC exchange of implementation evidence. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12961-019-0463-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A knowledge implementation model in health system management based on the PARIHS model

“…As the results of this study demonstrated, managers' lack of access to knowledge resources and workload are among the barriers that prevent knowledge implementation. The results of other studies confirm these findings and emphasize barriers such as lack of time (having multiple responsibilities and attending meetings) to apply knowledge [49], insufficient skills and newness to work processes [50,51], and the language of the journal that is mainly English [52]. To eliminate these barriers, it is necessary to provide managers with a summary of knowledge resources.…”

Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice about Mental Health Challenges among Healthcare Students of a Private University

“…[ 26 ] According to one pilot study, 75% of lifetime cases of diagnosable mental disorders began by the age of 24. [ 27 ] This research survey on MHC is not a substitute for treatment but will create awareness. Hopefully, it will help to motivate some resources that could lead students to happier and healthier university lives.…”

Knowledge translation following the implementation of a state-wide Paediatric Sepsis Pathway in the emergency department- a multi-centre survey study

“…The TDF identifies key factors supporting behaviour change in clinicians to inform strategies to enhance the uptake of evidence-based practice [ 21 , 22 , 25 ]. Once factors associated with the utilisation of evidence-based pathways are identified, interventions can be designed to increase KT [ 26 ].…”

“…Little is known about KT and sepsis pathways [ 28 ] and no known KT studies exist focusing on paediatric sepsis and nurses. Nurses’ perceptions and engagement are key to successful KT [ 26 ] of clinical pathways. To advance knowledge and application of evidence-based practice, we introduced a Paediatric Sepsis Pathway (PSP), including targeted education for nurses on paediatric sepsis recognition, escalation and management, and on how to translate the PSP into practice.…”