Applying the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach to a large pragmatic study involving safety net clinics

Abstract

BackgroundThe Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle is a commonly used improvement process in health care settings, although its documented use in pragmatic clinical research is rare. A recent pragmatic clinical research study, called the Strategies and Opportunities to STOP Colon Cancer in Priority Populations (STOP CRC), used this process to optimize the research implementation of an automated colon cancer screening outreach program in intervention clinics. We describe the process of using this PDSA approach, the selection of PDSA topics by clinic leaders, and project leaders’ reactions to using PDSA in pragmatic research.MethodsSTOP CRC is a cluster-randomized pragmatic study that aims to test the effectiveness of a direct-mail fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) program involving eight Federally Qualified Health Centers in Oregon and California. We and a practice improvement specialist trained in the PDSA process delivered structured presentations to leaders of these centers; the presentations addressed how to apply the PDSA process to improve implementation of a mailed outreach program offering colorectal cancer screening through FIT tests. Center leaders submitted PDSA plans and delivered reports via webinar at quarterly meetings of the project’s advisory board. Project staff conducted one-on-one, 45-min interviews with project leads from each health center to assess the reaction to and value of the PDSA process in supporting the implementation of STOP CRC.ResultsClinic-selected PDSA activities included refining the intervention staffing model, improving outreach materials, and changing workflow steps. Common benefits of using PDSA cycles in pragmatic research were that it provided a structure for staff to focus on improving the program and it allowed staff to test the change they wanted to see. A commonly reported challenge was measuring the success of the PDSA process with the available electronic medical record tools.ConclusionUnderstanding how the PDSA process can be applied to pragmatic trials and the reaction of clinic staff to their use may help clinics integrate evidence-based interventions into their everyday care processes.Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01742065. Registered October 31, 2013.

Integration of Tobacco Treatment Services into Cancer Care at Stanford

“…The planning effort by the Tobacco Treatment Service team started in August 2018 and has been supported by a Moonshot P30 Supplement Award (P30CA124435-11S1) as part of the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Center Cessation Initiative (C3I). By adhering to the "Plan, Do, Study, Act" (PDSA) methodology [24,25], the team implements weekly improvements to advance the quality and effectiveness of services provided to patients and family members. Reported here is the process, methods, and results from engaging providers and patients in three pilot clinics at the Stanford Cancer Center Palo Alto location (Head and Neck Oncology, Thoracic Oncology, and GI Surgery Oncology) and the subsequent efforts for center-wide implementation.…”

Health Promotion Interventions: Lessons from the Transfer of Good Practices in CHRODIS-PLUS

“…The plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycle presents a pragmatic scientific method for testing changes in complex systems. The four stages mirror the scientific experimental method of formulating a hypothesis, collecting data to test this hypothesis, analyzing and interpreting the results, and making inferences to iterate the hypothesis [23][24][25]. The pragmatic principles of PDSA cycles promote the use of an iterative approach to test interventions.…”

Implementation of a transformative learning collaborative training for family doctor teams and managers: a description of participant process and perception

“…In between these learning sessions were 'action periods' (AP), which were equally important. After each LS, all teams engaged in Plan-Do-Study-Action (PDSA) [13] activities. A PDSA cycle consisted of: 1) 'Planning' objectives, questions, predictions, and the circle itself (who, what, where, when); 2) 'Doing' by carrying out the plan, documenting problems, noting unexpected observations, and beginning to analyse the data; 3) 'Studying' by completing the data analysis, comparing the data to predictions, and summarising the acquired knowledge; and 4) 'Acting', which involved re ning changes based on what can be learnt from the activity, contemplating on which changes can be made, and preparing to run the next circle.…”