Applying the nutrition education DESIGN procedure to the development of the In Defence of Food Curriculum

Abstract

Objective: This study describes the use of the Nutrition Education DESIGN Procedure for developing the In Defence of Food Curriculum, a health education curriculum serving as the companion guide to the In Defence of Food documentary film based on the book with the same title. Design: The DESIGN Procedure is a systematic stepwise framework that produces behaviourally focused, theory-driven health education programmes and evaluation plans. Methods: DESIGN begins with an audience assessment and literature review that guides the selection of desired behaviours and psycho-social theory. For the In Defence of Food Curriculum, the desired behaviour changes were increased intake of whole/minimally processed plant-based foods and decreased intake of highly processed foods. A theoretical framework combining social cognitive and social determination theories guided programme development and evaluation plans. Education theory guided translating this framework into a ready-to-deliver curriculum. DESIGN aims to ensure alignment of theory determinants/mediators, behaviour change strategies, objectives, instructional activities and evaluation measures for systematically addressing desired behaviour changes. Over the course of 10 lessons, young people participate in interactive activities that explore the benefits of healthy eating, while appreciating how the ubiquity of heavily marketed and highly processed foods make healthy eating challenging. The evaluation plan guides measurement of target behaviours and the theory-based determinants/mediators. Results: This case study describes the development of the In Defence of Food curriculum using the DESIGN Procedure and demonstrates how a comprehensive and structured method for health education curriculum development and evaluation planning can be applied. Conclusion: The DESIGN Procedure has relevance for researchers, practitioners and programme planners.

Developing a Diet and Physical Activity Intervention for Hispanic/Latina Breast Cancer Survivors

“…The Social Cognitive Theory based intervention targets 4 key behaviors: (1) increase daily fruit and vegetable intake, (2) decrease percentage of daily calories from dietary fat, (3) decrease percentage of daily calories from added sugar, and (4) increase daily minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity. While DESIGN has previously been used in other settings, 63 this is the first study that we are aware of to develop and test a theory-based educational program with similar content for both in-person group education and e-Health formats and for both diet and physical activity. This is also one of the first studies to use, and describe in detail, a systematic curriculum development process to develop such a program for a racial/ethnic minority population with a specific health concern.…”

Recommendations for Integrating Evidence-Based, Sustainable Diet Information into Nutrition Education

“…The above examples of how SD concepts can be incorporated into nutrition education are limited to the authors' experiences, and should be coupled with the shared experiences of others who have developed audience-specific nutrition education inclusive of information regarding SD. For example, curricula like "In Defense of Food [218]" can spark additional ideas among readers that will translate into effective means for incorporating SD information into a variety of nutrition education venues for various audiences.…”

A nutrition education service learning programme: Development, implementation and impact on participants

“…In nutrition education implementation, classroom management and student engagement increase when interactive activities are used rather than reading, writing or discussion (Lee et al, 2013). Incorporating effective engagement strategies, communication strategies, and behaviour change theories into the design of nutrition education programmes may be helpful to enhance the delivery and impact of the presented information (Luesse et al, 2019; Nguyen and Murimi, 2017).…”