2009
DOI: 10.4102/sajhrm.v7i1.232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying the nominal group technique in an employment relations conflict situation: A case study of a university maintenance section in South Africa

Abstract: After a breakdown in employment relations in the maintenance section of a higher education institution, the authors were asked to intervene in order to try and solve the employment relations conflict situation. It was decided to employ the Nominal Group Technique (NGT) as a tool in problem identification during conflict in the workplace. An initial investigation of documentation and interviews with prominent individuals in the organisation was carried out. The NGT was then used in four focus group discussions … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Primarily, NGTs offer a high level of efficiency in achieving group consensus in comparison to focus groups, which can be significantly impacted by group dynamics, dominant personalities, and biases of participants and researchers [38]. Equally important in the selection of NGTs is their proven use in research in health care research, including among individuals working in health care in the African context [39][40][41][42][43]. In our study, NGTs will be used to generate a prioritized list of recommendations among health care workers and administrators, which will be examined further in subsequent in-depth interviews.…”
Section: Study Aims and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Primarily, NGTs offer a high level of efficiency in achieving group consensus in comparison to focus groups, which can be significantly impacted by group dynamics, dominant personalities, and biases of participants and researchers [38]. Equally important in the selection of NGTs is their proven use in research in health care research, including among individuals working in health care in the African context [39][40][41][42][43]. In our study, NGTs will be used to generate a prioritized list of recommendations among health care workers and administrators, which will be examined further in subsequent in-depth interviews.…”
Section: Study Aims and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, NGTs are noted for their usability and outputs, typically prioritized lists of actions, and can be a useful method to compare viewpoints and priorities of stakeholder groups [39]. NGT methods have also been shown to reduce researcher bias and have been applied frequently in health research, particularly among health care workers-including in sub-Saharan Africa [39][40][41][42][43]54].…”
Section: Phasementioning
confidence: 99%