2015
DOI: 10.1177/0020764015573084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying the CHIME recovery framework in two culturally diverse Australian communities: Qualitative results

Abstract: CHIME was applicable in both groups, but culture mediated how cross-cutting issues (e.g. stigma) and sub-components of CHIME were operationalised. Recovery was also influenced by participant's socio-economic context. Research, policy and practice implications are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
71
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Participant observation data (from 47 participants) and interview data (from seventeen participants) were initially analysed thematically [45] through an inductive process, with first order themes identified and subthemes developed through an interplay between data and theory throughout the ethnographic process [49]. For this article, and in a similar manner to Brijnath [50], an additional step was taken to code data in line with the CHIME framework [9] in a deductive process, which meant that the data coded under one code name were categorised into two or three subcomponents within the overall analysis. This was done in order to both evaluate the football sessions against the well-established and evidence-based CHIME framework and to also locate the current study within the broader recovery literature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participant observation data (from 47 participants) and interview data (from seventeen participants) were initially analysed thematically [45] through an inductive process, with first order themes identified and subthemes developed through an interplay between data and theory throughout the ethnographic process [49]. For this article, and in a similar manner to Brijnath [50], an additional step was taken to code data in line with the CHIME framework [9] in a deductive process, which meant that the data coded under one code name were categorised into two or three subcomponents within the overall analysis. This was done in order to both evaluate the football sessions against the well-established and evidence-based CHIME framework and to also locate the current study within the broader recovery literature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This will allow new understandings to be uncovered. While the CHIME framework is considered to offer a comprehensive overview of the process of recovery, it has only been used in HICs with predominantly White populations so its applicability with ethnically and culturally diverse groups is unknown 12 30. The role of non-government organisations and traditional healers in providing services that facilitate recovery for people living with SMIs will be examined if this arises from the scoping review.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This frameworkconceptualises personal recovery to incorporate the following concepts: c onnectedness, h ope and o ptimism about the future, i dentity, m eaning in life and e mpowerment 12. This highlights that literature on personal recovery is dominated by research conducted in HICs and that there is a gap in understanding recovery from culturally diverse groups 30…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very recently, Piat et al (31) inquired into the role that choice plays in the recovery process for persons with mental health problems living in supported residential facilities. Using qualitative interviews, they concluded that living in a residential facility strengthens tenants' ability to take personal responsibility and make choices concerning their everyday activities and routine, like cooking and shopping groceries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%