Applying the Bradford Hill criteria in the 21st century: how data integration has changed causal inference in molecular epidemiology

Abstract

In 1965, Sir Austin Bradford Hill published nine “viewpoints” to help determine if observed epidemiologic associations are causal. Since then, the “Bradford Hill Criteria” have become the most frequently cited framework for causal inference in epidemiologic studies. However, when Hill published his causal guidelines—just 12 years after the double-helix model for DNA was first suggested and 25 years before the Human Genome Project began—disease causation was understood on a more elementary level than it is today. Advancements in genetics, molecular biology, toxicology, exposure science, and statistics have increased our analytical capabilities for exploring potential cause-and-effect relationships, and have resulted in a greater understanding of the complexity behind human disease onset and progression. These additional tools for causal inference necessitate a re-evaluation of how each Bradford Hill criterion should be interpreted when considering a variety of data types beyond classic epidemiology studies. Herein, we explore the implications of data integration on the interpretation and application of the criteria. Using examples of recently discovered exposure–response associations in human disease, we discuss novel ways by which researchers can apply and interpret the Bradford Hill criteria when considering data gathered using modern molecular techniques, such as epigenetics, biomarkers, mechanistic toxicology, and genotoxicology.

How to attribute causality in quality improvement: lessons from epidemiology

“…Pragmatic amendments to the BHC are permissible (eg, combining plausibility and coherence). Refinements to the BHC will be desirable as new scientific advances provide insights into mechanisms by which interventions influence outcomes 20. Further, the BHC should not be considered ‘the letter of the law’.…”

Relationship between growth, maturation and musculoskeletal conditions in adolescents: a systematic review

“…Per the Bradford-Hill criteria for causal inference,81 the exposure must precede the onset of the disease. Studies in this review seldom established whether participants had a history free of the MSK condition at enrolment; only 8 of the 208 associations adjusted for physical complaints,23 functional somatic syndromes,30 43 previous low back pain43 or fracture history 63.…”

Roles of Diacylglycerols and Ceramides in Hepatic Insulin Resistance

“…The Bradford Hill criteria provide a conceptual framework for assessing putative cause-effect relationships in biology [97]. We now attempt a brief evaluation of DAG and ceramide as causal factors in lipid-induced hepatic insulin resistance using these criteria.…”