2019
DOI: 10.3390/ani9121104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying the 3Rs: A Case Study on Evidence and Perceptions Relating to Rat Cage Height in the UK

Abstract: This article investigates the barriers to implementing higher caging in animal research establishments in the UK. The use of animals in research and testing in the UK is regulated by the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986, which sets out how animal experiments must be licensed and regulated. Within this, the Code of Practice currently allows laboratory rats to be housed in cages that are 20 cm high, even though adults can rear up to 30 cm. Most adult rats therefore cannot stand upright in ‘standard’ cage… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers sometimes call for further evidence even in cases where evidence exists. For example, research has shown that typical laboratory rat cages do not provide sufficient vertical space [ 11 , 133 ], but lab animal stakeholders interviewed about cage height were generally unreceptive to change, citing a lack of scientific evidence [ 134 ]. In this example, stakeholders were seemingly influenced by their own experiences, assumptions about rat behaviour, or a desire to generate their own data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers sometimes call for further evidence even in cases where evidence exists. For example, research has shown that typical laboratory rat cages do not provide sufficient vertical space [ 11 , 133 ], but lab animal stakeholders interviewed about cage height were generally unreceptive to change, citing a lack of scientific evidence [ 134 ]. In this example, stakeholders were seemingly influenced by their own experiences, assumptions about rat behaviour, or a desire to generate their own data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is also consistent with a study by that found that female laboratory rats will frequently climb and dig when given an opportunity to do so 36 . Additionally, there is evidence that providing rats with space to rear reduces anxiety-like behaviour and cages allowing sufficient room to rear and provision of foraging opportunities are recommended to enhance rat welfare [71][72][73] . While further research should be conducted to elucidate the full extent to which allowing rats to perform these common behaviours could be beneficial to welfare, the available evidence supports the use of large cages that allow rats to rear, climb, and bound, with both nesting material and a digging substrate provided for both pet and laboratory rats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is nevertheless important to ask the question of whether and in what ways guidelines for the welfare of the same species should vary according to the purposes for which they are being kept. Indeed, this issue is just one part of the continuing progression of animal welfare regulation; for example, the need for laboratory rats to be able to rear fully in their cages and the use of playpens for enrichment have received growing attention 8,9,12,42,43 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, this issue is just one part of the continuing progression of animal welfare regulation; for example, the need for laboratory rats to be able to rear fully in their cages and the use of playpens for enrichment have received growing attention. 8,9,12,42,43 During the development of these guidelines, there were some areas of conflict. For example, there was much disagreement about how to rank the different aspects of rat housing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation