Applying Systems Science to Evaluate a Community-Based Social Marketing Innovation

Abstract

In the United States, community coalitions are an important part of the public health milieu, and thus, subject to many of the same external pressures as other organizations—including changes in required strategic orientation. Many funding agencies have shifted their funding agenda from program development to policy change. Thus, the Florida Prevention Research Center created the Community-Based Prevention Marketing (CBPM) for Policy Development framework to teach community coalitions how to apply social marketing to policy change. The research reported here was designed to explicate the framework’s theory of change. We describe and demonstrate a hybrid evaluation approach: utilization-focused developmental evaluation. The research question was “What are the linkages and connections among CBPM inputs, activities, immediate outcomes, intermediate outcomes, and ultimate impacts?” We implemented a case study design, with the case being a normative community coalition. The study adhered to a well-developed series of steps for system dynamics modeling. Community coalition leaders may expect CBPM to provide immediate gains in coalition performance. Results from causal diagramming show how gains in performance are delayed and follow an initial decline in performance. We discuss the practical implications for CBPM’s developers—for example, importance of managing coalition expectations—and other social marketers—for example, expansion of the evaluation toolkit.

Unintended consequences in demarketing antisocial behaviour: projectBernie

“…Evaluation is acknowledged as very important, yet often a weak link, in social marketing interventions (Biroscak et al, 2014;Brace-Govan, 2015;Lister & Merritt, 2013), which may not lend themselves to the 'gold standard' of randomised trials or other experimental designs (Grier & Bryant, 2005). Evaluation is also a perceived weakness in ASB prevention initiatives where systematic collation of local data and evaluation of outcomes in terms of impact on communities and reduction of ASB have been weak (Hodgkinson & Tilley, 2011).…”

Dynamic Performance Management: An Approach for Managing the Common Goods

“…Community-based prevention [133] implications for community-based prevention marketing's developers and other social marketers Bodyweight gain/loss [134] health care professionals failed to understand simple dynamic impact of energy intake and energy expenditure Carbon labelling [135] consumers' responses to carbon labelled products and number of consumers Societal ageing [136] demographic and social security system to investigate governmental retirement and healthcare contributions…”

An environmental social marketing intervention in cultural heritage tourism: a realist evaluation

“…Social Marketing has developed as a field over the last 40 years, but it is generally agreed that there is room for improvement in its practice and one of the most significant areas for development is evaluation (Biroscak, Schneider, Panzera, Bryant, McDermott, Mayer, Khaliq, Lindenberger, Courtney, Swanson, Wright & Hovmand, 2014). Increasingly, social marketers are focusing on evaluation (Polit, 2012), which is clearly an essential element, largely because of increasingly stretched resources and the need to demonstrate best value for money (Lister & Merritt, 2013).…”