2013
DOI: 10.1521/ijgp.2013.63.2.234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying Systems-Centered Theory (SCT) and Methods in Organizational Contexts: Putting SCT to Work

Abstract: Though initially applied in psychotherapy, a theory of living human systems (TLHS) and its systems-centered practice (SCT) offer a comprehensive conceptual framework replete with operational definitions and methods that is applicable in a wide range of contexts. This article elaborates the application of SCT in organizations by first summarizing systems-centered theory, its constructs and methods, and then using case examples to illustrate how SCT has been used in organizational and coaching contexts.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a measure with the six dimensions resource activation , problem actuation , mastery , clarification of meaning , emotional bond , with three items each and agreement on collaboration , which comprises the aspects tasks and goals , with six items. The two dimensions emotional bond and agreement on collaboration refer to Bordin´s [23] concept of the therapeutic alliance. The SACiP consists of 21 items, which are rated on a 5-stepped scale ranging from 0 (not correct at all) to 4 (fully correct) with correspondingly formulated items from patient and therapist perspective.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is a measure with the six dimensions resource activation , problem actuation , mastery , clarification of meaning , emotional bond , with three items each and agreement on collaboration , which comprises the aspects tasks and goals , with six items. The two dimensions emotional bond and agreement on collaboration refer to Bordin´s [23] concept of the therapeutic alliance. The SACiP consists of 21 items, which are rated on a 5-stepped scale ranging from 0 (not correct at all) to 4 (fully correct) with correspondingly formulated items from patient and therapist perspective.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, relapses are regarded as integral parts in the change cycle [10]. The most widely used dimensional instrument to measure the stages of change is the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment (URICA, [11]). Recently, a short version with excellent psychometric properties has been constructed [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functional subgrouping is now used extensively in both organizational and clinical settings in the United States, Europe and Japan [7]. In addition, research suggests that SCT methods may be useful in improving outcome and morale in organizations, as predicted by SCT theory.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models are termed "multi-level" [6][7][8] or "hierarchic and isomorphic system" models [8][9][10] they aim to integrate theory, practice, and research, and to facilitate more powerful, parsimonious organizational intervention methods that improve performance at all levels of system's hierarchy if properly implemented. The goal of this paper is to introduce systems-centered theory and practice as well as to review the empirical studies of SCT methods including studies of comparative training group and work group performance and the unique, cardinal SCT method of functional subgrouping [9,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SCT's functional subgrouping is now used extensively in the United States, Europe, and most recently in Japan both by group psychotherapists and organizational consultants in team development (Gantt, 2013). Though many group leaders have adopted functional subgrouping, and reported anecdotal success with it (Gantt, 2012), assessing functional subgrouping as a process variable has been hampered by the limitations of the original Functional Subgrouping Questionnaire (FSQ; O'Neill, Agazarian, Ladden, & Carter, 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%