2017
DOI: 10.3897/natureconservation.18.12235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying surrogate species presences to correct sample bias in species distribution models: a case study using the Pilbara population of the Northern Quoll

Abstract: The management of populations of threatened species requires the capacity to identify areas of high habitat value. We developed a high resolution species distribution model (SDM) for the endangered Pilbara northern quoll Dasyurus hallucatus, population using MaxEnt software and a combined suite of bioclimatic and landscape variables. Once common throughout much of northern Australia, this marsupial carnivore has recently declined throughout much of its former range and is listed as endangered by the IUCN. Othe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used a ‘target group’ background sampling approach to generate the bias layers (Phillips et al, ). We defined our target group as all critical weight range (CWR) mammals (including northern quoll) within the study area (following Molloy, Davis, Dunlop, & van Etten, ). These species were selected as survey methods used to detect them would also detect the northern quoll (following Molloy et al, )—typically a highly detectable species (Austin, Tuft, Ramp, Cremona, & Webb, )—thus ensuring both northern quoll presence data and model background data were drawn from a comparable sampling intensity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We used a ‘target group’ background sampling approach to generate the bias layers (Phillips et al, ). We defined our target group as all critical weight range (CWR) mammals (including northern quoll) within the study area (following Molloy, Davis, Dunlop, & van Etten, ). These species were selected as survey methods used to detect them would also detect the northern quoll (following Molloy et al, )—typically a highly detectable species (Austin, Tuft, Ramp, Cremona, & Webb, )—thus ensuring both northern quoll presence data and model background data were drawn from a comparable sampling intensity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We defined our target group as all critical weight range (CWR) mammals (including northern quoll) within the study area (following Molloy, Davis, Dunlop, & van Etten, ). These species were selected as survey methods used to detect them would also detect the northern quoll (following Molloy et al, )—typically a highly detectable species (Austin, Tuft, Ramp, Cremona, & Webb, )—thus ensuring both northern quoll presence data and model background data were drawn from a comparable sampling intensity. Target group species records were subjected to point density analysis (PDA), masked to a 1 km 2 grid layer using ArcGIS 10.3, creating a layer with cell values that accurately represent survey effort in relation to location.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations