2011
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2011.2157516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying Reliability Assessment Methods to Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage System (SMES) Designs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2. For solving (6), the Hasofer Lind and Rackwitz Fiessler (HL-RF) method [5] is employed here because of its simplicity and efficiency. The flowchart of the HL-RF method is illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: ) Transformation Of a Design Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2. For solving (6), the Hasofer Lind and Rackwitz Fiessler (HL-RF) method [5] is employed here because of its simplicity and efficiency. The flowchart of the HL-RF method is illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: ) Transformation Of a Design Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6]. The methodology for treating optimization problems in the presence of uncertainties of design parameters/variables can be categorized into two approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…R ECENTLY, robust design optimization (RDO) has been developed and applied in electromagnetic (EM) designs [1]- [5]. Unlike conventional deterministic design optimization (DDO), the outstanding merit of robust design is to incorporate design uncertainty into an early design stage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, they do not address the quantitative assessment of the first two statistical moments, mean and variance, of system output. In other words, they cannot give any probabilistic information on how much the impact of the uncertainty concerned with system input is on system output at a nominal design [5]- [8]. On the other hand, MCS could be accurate for the moment estimation, but it requires a large number of function evaluations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%