2011
DOI: 10.5267/j.msl.2011.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying Pareto multi-criteria decision making in concurrent engineering: A case study of polyethylene industry

Abstract: Concurrent engineering (CE) is one of the widest known techniques for simultaneous planning of product and process design. In concurrent engineering, design processes are often complicated with multiple conflicting criteria and discrete sets of feasible alternatives. Thus multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) techniques are integrated into CE to perform concurrent design. This paper proposes a design framework governed by MCDM technique, which are in conflict in the sense of competing for common resources to a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PEG method was used for multi-criteria decisionmaking in several studies such as: polyethylene pipe design [32]; Flexural plate design, and in Seismic structural retrofitting. In both of these cases, the best option is the same as cases using the methods ELECTRE III, PROM-ETHEE I and II, and AHP [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PEG method was used for multi-criteria decisionmaking in several studies such as: polyethylene pipe design [32]; Flexural plate design, and in Seismic structural retrofitting. In both of these cases, the best option is the same as cases using the methods ELECTRE III, PROM-ETHEE I and II, and AHP [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tabriz et al (2011) used Pareto multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) model in polyethylene industry to perform concurrent design. Athawale and Chakraborty (2011) implemented MCDM methods for industrial robot selection and ranked them based on their performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%