2019 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/biocas.2019.8919117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying Outlier Detection and Independent Component Analysis for Compressed Sensing EEG Measurement Framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When CR = 4 or more, there are slight differences in the reconstruction accuracy; however, it is clear that the proposed framework can recover with a higher accuracy than only CS, although the proposed framework does not need MPUs to operate ICA in the sensing unit. If a higher reconstruction accuracy is desired, then an additional signal processing can be accepted in the data processing unit; for example, applying an additional method for removing artifacts efficiently [25] is also one solution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When CR = 4 or more, there are slight differences in the reconstruction accuracy; however, it is clear that the proposed framework can recover with a higher accuracy than only CS, although the proposed framework does not need MPUs to operate ICA in the sensing unit. If a higher reconstruction accuracy is desired, then an additional signal processing can be accepted in the data processing unit; for example, applying an additional method for removing artifacts efficiently [25] is also one solution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are other recent studies that have discussed this issue (see, e.g., [25][26][27]), where the ICA is performed after the CS. In fact, there are major drawbacks of this method due to the neglect of two important factors: 1) The use of a Gaussian random measurement matrix Φ ∈ R m×n in the sensing unit to measure sparse biosignals usually following non-Gaussian distributions (e.g., sub-Gaussian, super-Gaussian, or mixed super-, sub-, and Gaussian distributions) [28].…”
Section: Icamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We created a dictionary matrix using the K-SVD dictionary learning algorithm with EEG signals based on the CHB-MIT scalp EEG database [12]. The sampling rate of the EEG signals was changed from 256 Hz/sample to 200 Hz/sample to be the same as that used in [6], [7], [9] When using the K-SVD dictionary for a CS framework with OD-ICA, it is necessary to reveal the optimal sparse parameters during training and reconstruction, as well as the suitable number of the dictionary matrix size. Considering the relationship with the sparse parameter r when using the OMP algorithm in the reconstruction, we determined the optimal s parameter.…”
Section: Dictionary Creationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison purposes, the region containing pseudoeye-blink artifact was not considered when calculating the NMSE to realize same evaluation as [6], [7], and [9]. At first, suitable sparse parameters are evaluated.…”
Section: Reconstruction Of Compressed Eegsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation