Applying Multiple Methods to Comprehensively Evaluate a Patient Portal’s Effectiveness to Convey Information to Patients

Abstract

BackgroundPatient portals have yet to achieve their full potential for enhancing health communication and improving health outcomes. Although the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act in the United States mandates the utilization of patient portals, and usage continues to rise, their impact has not been as profound as anticipated.ObjectiveThe objective of our case study was to evaluate how well portals convey information to patients. To demonstrate how multiple methodologies could be used to evaluate and improve the design of patient-centered portals, we conducted an in-depth evaluation of an exemplar patient-centered portal designed to promote preventive care to consumers.MethodsWe used 31 critical incident patient interviews, 2 clinician focus groups, and a thematic content analysis to understand patients’ and clinicians’ perspectives, as well as theoretical understandings of the portal’s use.ResultsWe gathered over 140 critical incidents, 71.8% (102/142) negative and 28.2% (40/142) positive. Positive incident categories were (1) instant medical information access, (2) clear health information, and (3) patient vigilance. Negative incident categories were (1) standardized content, (2) desire for direct communication, (3) website functionality, and (4) difficulty interpreting laboratory data. Thematic analysis of the portal’s immediacy resulted in high scores in the attributes enhances understanding (18/23, 78%), personalization (18/24, 75%), and motivates behavior (17/24, 71%), but low levels of interactivity (7/24, 29%) and engagement (2/24, 8%). Two overarching themes emerged to guide portal refinements: (1) communication can be improved with directness and interactivity and (2) perceived personalization must be greater to engage patients.ConclusionsResults suggest that simple modifications, such as increased interactivity and personalized messages, can make portals customized, robust, easily accessible, and trusted information sources.

Methods for Evaluating Respondent Attrition in Web-Based Surveys

“…The study was conducted between January and August, 2014 at 12 primary care practices in northern Virginia that used the interactive online patient portal MyPreventiveCare (MPC) [22-25], which links directly to the practices’ EHR. The IDM module was programmed to query the EHR database to identify 3 groups of patients with MPC accounts: women aged 40-49 years who had not had a mammogram within 2 years, men aged 55-69 years who had not had a prostate-specific antigen test within 2 years, and adults aged 50-74 years who were not up-to-date with colorectal cancer screening.…”

Oncologists' Perceptions of a Digital Tool to Improve Cancer Survivors' Cardiovascular Health

“…To understand the differences in the context of the CV tool used in oncology versus primary care, we chose qualitative methods to better inform tool redesign. These qualitative techniques have been used in the development of clinical decision-support systems, 45 shared decision-making tools, 46 patient portal tools, 47 as well as in other health information technology applications. 48,49 Setting/Participants One academic and one community oncology practice in North Carolina were selected as recruitment sites.…”

Healthcare IT Utilization and Penetration among Physicians: Novel IT Solutions in Healthcare – Use and Acceptance in Hospitals

“…At the same time a growing number of patients use HIT applications to monitor their health and physical conditions in case of various pathological entities [2][3][4] or to inform themselves about their treatment plan [5]. Approaches to improve the effectiveness and trustworthiness of tools for online communication between caregivers and patients have been scientifically examined [6][7][8], displaying a lack of connectivity and interoperability.…”