Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Joint Conference and 2018 International Symposium on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computi 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3267305.3267515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying Multiple Knowledge to Sussex-Huawei Locomotion Challenge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sound and vision classifiers are among the first works that are applied to transportation mode recognition. The motion classifier was used to benchmark the SHL Challenge 2018 [17] and performed slightly worse than the winner of that challenge [32]. Since this paper mainly focuses on multimodal fusion, we did not aim to maximize the performance of each mono-modal classifier.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The sound and vision classifiers are among the first works that are applied to transportation mode recognition. The motion classifier was used to benchmark the SHL Challenge 2018 [17] and performed slightly worse than the winner of that challenge [32]. Since this paper mainly focuses on multimodal fusion, we did not aim to maximize the performance of each mono-modal classifier.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the classifiers show promising results on the same user, the performance drops significantly in case of user variation. In future, more techniques could be employed to tackle the over-fitting problem, including some techniques reported in the SHL challenge, such as augmented learning, transfer learning, and designing hand-crafted features [32], [35], [36]. In essence, multimodal fusion improves the recognition performance at the expense of increasing the sensor channels and also the computational complexity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In other words, there is often more "human optimization" involved in using DL effectively. However, the best DL performance (JSI-Deep [1], 93.9%) is only 1.5% higher than the best ML performance (JSI-Classic [2], 92.4%). While the approach used by JSI-Deep is categorized as a DL pipeline, it is actually an ensemble of deep and classical machine learning models.…”
Section: Summary Of Approachesmentioning
confidence: 97%