2003
DOI: 10.5194/hess-7-43-2003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying MODFLOW to wet grassland in-field habitats: a casestudy from the Pevensey Levels, UK

Abstract: Historical drainage improvements have created complex hydrological regimes in many low-lying, wet coastal grassland areas. The manipulation of ditch water levels is a common management technique to maintain important in-stream and in-field habitats in such areas. However, in wet grasslands with low soil conductivities the water table in the centre of each field is not closely coupled to variations in ditch stage. Consequently rainfall and evaporation have a greater influence on the depth to water table and wat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The S y values investigated by all three methods (Table ) are within the range of typical literature values. For instance, Bradford and Acreman () listed the S y values for alluvial deposits to range from 1 to 10% (mean 6%) for clays and 10–30% for silty sands. Due to variability of the S y values even within the same textural classes, Healy and Cook () recommend using smaller values for better recharge estimation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The S y values investigated by all three methods (Table ) are within the range of typical literature values. For instance, Bradford and Acreman () listed the S y values for alluvial deposits to range from 1 to 10% (mean 6%) for clays and 10–30% for silty sands. Due to variability of the S y values even within the same textural classes, Healy and Cook () recommend using smaller values for better recharge estimation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the lower horizon in field 1 (B 2 113-160 cm), which has 59% sand and 16.2% clay, has the highest S y (11.5%) in this method. For instance, Bradford and Acreman (2003) listed the S y values for alluvial deposits to range from 1 to 10% (mean 6%) for clays and 10-30% for silty sands. The S y values obtained by moisture-tension and mechanical-analysis methods were also generally related to sand content (Tables II and III).…”
Section: Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where ET plays a significant role (e.g. Bradley, ; Bradford and Acreman, , Wang et al ., ; del Pilar Alvarez et al ., ). This relationship is more appropriate for the common situation where there are insufficient data to support a more complex treatment of the ET–WT depth relationship.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, at the scales considered here, where it is recognized that this relationship is likely heterogeneous and difficult to characterize, we revert to the linear relation used successfully in a number of regional modelling studies, e.g. where ET plays a significant role (e. g. Bradley, 2002;Bradford andAcreman, 2003, Wang et al, 2008;del Pilar Alvarez et al, 2012). This relationship is more appropriate for the common situation where there are insufficient data to support a more complex treatment of the ET-WT depth relationship.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As they allow characteristics of the environment to be taken into consideration on a detailed scale, physically-based, spatiallydistributed models are valuable tools for improving knowledge of SW-GW exchanges and assessing the three-dimensional nature of the problem ( Sophocleous, 1998, Bradford andAcreman, 2003 ). Numerous studies featuring distributed models and including SW-GW exchanges in floodplain areas have been carried out, encompassing SW-GW exchange patterns and biogeochemical zonation induced by meander sinuosity ( Boano et al, 2006, Boano et al, 2010, heat transport ( Brookfield et al, 2009, Horritt et al, 2006, 3D-flow patterns in relation to river level variations ( Derx et al, 2010, Nützmann et al, 2013, hydrofacies heterogeneity impact on SW-GW exchanges ( Frei et al, 2009 ), SW-GW exchange impact on floodplain water balance , solute transport through riparian areas , Hoffmann et al, 2006, Peyrard et al, 2008 and contribution of GW to stream water ( Partington et al, 2011 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%