2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-014-3611-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying mean systemic filling pressure to assess the response to fluid boluses in cardiac post-surgical patients

Abstract: Using an algorithm to derive a mean systemic filling pressure analogue, cardiac power and dynamic measures of the venous return pressure gradient relative to the mean systemic filling pressure provided an assessment of the efficiency of volume expansion in post-surgical cardiac patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
42
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
6
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following approval of the local Human Research Ethics Committee (LNR/15/LPOOL/47, approved 14th April 2015), 35 patients were enrolled in this prospective, observational study. A sample size of 30 patients was calculated to ensure that the change in CO following PLR as determined by pulmonary artery thermodilution could be estimated by a similar change ± 10% in CCA Dflow with a 95% confidence interval, using previous variance data from a similar cohort . Furthermore, 29 patients would be needed to ascertain a correlation coefficient r = 0.5 with a type I error of 0.05 and a type II error of 0.2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following approval of the local Human Research Ethics Committee (LNR/15/LPOOL/47, approved 14th April 2015), 35 patients were enrolled in this prospective, observational study. A sample size of 30 patients was calculated to ensure that the change in CO following PLR as determined by pulmonary artery thermodilution could be estimated by a similar change ± 10% in CCA Dflow with a 95% confidence interval, using previous variance data from a similar cohort . Furthermore, 29 patients would be needed to ascertain a correlation coefficient r = 0.5 with a type I error of 0.05 and a type II error of 0.2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Gupta et al. showing an E vol of 0.36 and 0.32 in the volume responding group vs. 0.07 and 0.03 in the non‐responding group …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The gold standard for assessing fluid responsiveness is defined as a change in the cardiac output or stroke volume ≥10–15% after a rapid 250 ml volume infusion [16]. However, as a simple, safe and reversible method that could promote venous blood move from the legs and splanchnic compartment to the thorax, the PLR is now used to accurately predict fluid responsiveness in most conditions [1719].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%