Applying height differentiation of tactile symbols to reduce the minimum horizontal distances between them on tactile maps

Abstract

In this paper, we wanted to verify the hypothesis that extruding cartographic symbols on tactile maps to different heights might allow reducing the minimum (suggested in the literature) horizontal distances between them, without impacting the overall map’s legibility. This approach might allow preparing tactile maps in smaller scales and thus, reducing production cost, or putting additional spatial information on the same map sheet that would not fit otherwise. To verify the hypothesis we have prepared 6 different stimuli variants with or without height differentiation applied and different horizontal distances between tactile symbols adopted (1 mm, 2 mm and 3 mm). In the controlled study sessions with 30 participants with visual impairments we have measured the times required for solving 3 different spatial tasks on 3D printed tactile stimuli. We have also performed qualitative analysis to learn participants’ opinions about the proposed design and materials used. It turns out that applying height differentiation not only results in shorter times required for solving spatial tasks but is also considered by blind individuals as a convenient improvement in terms of use comfort and allows reduction of recommended minimum horizontal distances between symbols on tactile maps.

Evaluation of Qualitative Colour Palettes for Tactile Maps

“…Having this in mind, the Colour blindness palette is characterized by the lowest number of errors related to area symbols, i.e., 5.2%. During our past study sessions with PVI [33], study participants often expressed their need to be able to comprehend tactile maps content immediately after seeing or touching them. For this reason, we have noted the instances of protracted analyses during the study session.…”

“…During our past study sessions with PVI [33], study participants often expressed their need to be able to comprehend tactile maps content immediately after seeing or touching them. For this reason, we have noted the instances of protracted analyses during the study session.…”