2019
DOI: 10.1002/gps.5228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying dignity of risk principles to improve quality of life for vulnerable persons

Abstract: Objectives: Freedom of choice impacts quality of life. Expressed through dignity of risk (DoR), nursing home (NH) residents should be afforded the dignity to take risks to enhance well-being. How DoR is understood and implemented in the context of aged care remains largely unknown. This study explored the meaning and the barriers and facilitators to applying DoR to NH residents. Methods:Qualitative study, comprising semistructured interviews. Senior policy makers and advocate guardians working in the aged care… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, if a resident at a heightened risk of falling is observed repeatedly attempting to independently ambulate, nurses and other allied health professionals could take the opportunity to ask the resident about the importance of ambulation to their quality of life, or the level of risk they are willing to take to preserve ambulation. Indeed, the act of risk‐taking can confer dignity, enhancing an individual's personal growth and quality of life (Woolford et al, 2020). To be consistently implemented by nurses and other allied health professionals, person‐centred discussions need to be supported by a culture of care that provides the time and support required for such personalised conversations and collaborative planning (Hunter et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, if a resident at a heightened risk of falling is observed repeatedly attempting to independently ambulate, nurses and other allied health professionals could take the opportunity to ask the resident about the importance of ambulation to their quality of life, or the level of risk they are willing to take to preserve ambulation. Indeed, the act of risk‐taking can confer dignity, enhancing an individual's personal growth and quality of life (Woolford et al, 2020). To be consistently implemented by nurses and other allied health professionals, person‐centred discussions need to be supported by a culture of care that provides the time and support required for such personalised conversations and collaborative planning (Hunter et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conflicts in decision-making were particularly evident in responses about independence and safety, with staff members talking about the need to balance these two priorities. The balance between risk and autonomy has been previously identified as a barrier to allowing aged care residents dignity in risk-taking, known in the literature as “dignity of risk” (Woolford et al, 2020). Other studies have documented similar tensions between risk and autonomy, particularly for older persons with dementia (Evans et al, 2018; Lawrence & Murray, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk taking supports an individual's autonomy, sense of agency and personal power (Zinn, 2015). Removing opportunities for risk taking limits an individual's capacity to make their own reasonable decisions, subsequently reducing the human right of autonomy (Ibrahim and Davis, 2013;Woolford et al, 2020). Reducing autonomy can negatively impact ageing, as maintaining sovereignty in older age can prevent depression and cognitive decline (Tomioka et al, 2017) and increase longevity (Minagawa and Saito, 2015).…”
Section: Risk and Ageingmentioning
confidence: 99%