Applying Conditionality to Development Assistance

Abstract

Applying Conditionality to Development AssistanceRoland Rich he announcement on 6 May 2004 by the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) of the 16 countries eligible to receive funding under the Bush Administration's Millennium Challenge Account (MCA) is a key step in the process of determining the direction of development assistance by applying quantitative international comparators to the governance performance of developing countries. It is the latest in a series of conditionality strategies aimed at making aid 'effective'. It is also the most sophisticated in terms of quantification of the eligibility conditions, giving the impression that the direction of aid flows has moved into a scientific direction of applying solid statistical information in a formulaic manner, thus making the system both transparent and reliable. The MCA process has the advantage of learning from previous experience, but whether it will be able to 'solve' the problem remains in doubt.This paper looks at the context for this initiative by tracing some of the key historical episodes shaping development assistance in an attempt to understand the increasing reliance on conditionality. A broad taxonomy of conditionality is proposed. The paper also examines the MCA process to date, looking at the growth of, and reliance on, statistical comparators as the critical decision-making tool. It concludes with some thoughts on the place of conditionality in development assistance and the place of statistics in conditionality.It is not within the aims of this paper to comment on, or attempt a measurement of, the effectiveness of aid. This is one of the big questions in development assistance. Recent work demonstrates the need for far greater care in tackling this issue and, in particular, the need to disaggregate emergency aid, institution-building aid delivering benefits over the longer term, and aid intended to stimulate growth in the shorter term (Clemens, Radelet and Bhavnani, 2004). While the debate on aid effectiveness continues, the working assumption in the development assistance community is that improvements in direction and delivery are necessary. Conditionality continues to be a key part of the formula.

Civic Habitus and the Challenges of Depoliticized Participatory Irrigation Management Reforms: Insights from Pakistan

“…This devolution of governance via "irrigation reforms" was an approach adopted by many developing countries under the influence of the World Bank and its funding (Liebrand 2019;Santiso 2001;Ul Hassan 2009). Indeed, for developing countries heavily dependent upon the Bank's lending -and facing severe financial indebtedness -the Bank's argument that the best route to financial solvency was to eschew the inefficiencies of the state and embrace market forces and privatization could be quite compelling; indeed, conditionality has long been a strategic tool of foreign aid (McNeill 1998;Rich 2004;Santiso 2001).…”

China’s Evolving Approach to Foreign Aid

“…Meanwhile, China's OOF-which is more commercially oriented Chinese development financing-is found to be driven by trade ties and natural resource, and is more likely to go to countries with relatively more developed institutions, more promising economic prospects and stable market. 148 In contrast, China invokes the principles of noninterference and respect for sovereignty-with one exception, on the One China principle. However, it often ties its development finance to goods and services procured from China.…”