Applying community assembly theory to restoration: overcoming dispersal and abiotic filters is key to diversifying California grassland

Abstract

Ecologists have explored community assembly through the framework of ecological filters, which predicts that species must overcome a series of challenges (i.e. pass through “filters”) to successfully establish in a given community. In the context of restoration, these filters (dispersal, abiotic, and biotic) can be manipulated to alter the resulting plant community by favoring native species or disadvantaging non‐native invasive species. We conducted two studies manipulating assembly filters at two California grassland sites previously dominated by non‐native species. At Site 1, we explored how variations in sequential seeding of native grasses and forbs (to overcome dispersal and biotic filters caused by priority effects) influenced the resulting community. At Site 2, we explored how thatch removal (to overcome the abiotic filter of light limitation) and herbicide‐based weed control (to overcome the biotic filter of competition from non‐native species) influenced the addition of native forbs into a partially restored grassland. Native forbs at Site 1 did not suffer from arriving after grasses, but native grasses benefited when given 1 year priority over forbs. At Site 2, dethatching increased native forb cover in a high rainfall year. Herbicide application reduced non‐native grass cover in dethatched plots without negatively affecting native cover. Native forb and grass cover were significant predictors of non‐native grass cover. However, they accounted for only 29% of the variation observed, suggesting there are other influential factors not considered in this study. Our results suggest that forbs can be incorporated into established native grasslands more successfully after dethatching.