2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemer.2010.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying classical shale gas evaluation concepts to Germany—Part II: Carboniferous in Northeast Germany

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a clean and efficient unconventional energy source, the exploration and development of shale gas are receiving increasingly more attention because of its considerable reserves and wide distribution. Due to the complex mineralogical compositions in shales, the wettability of shales in different regions is very complicated. Clay minerals in shales, for instance, montmorillonite, illite, kaolinite, and chlorite, and nonclay minerals in shales, for instance, quartz, calcite, dolomite, and feldspar, are usually hydrophilic, while the organic matter in shales is usually lipophilic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a clean and efficient unconventional energy source, the exploration and development of shale gas are receiving increasingly more attention because of its considerable reserves and wide distribution. Due to the complex mineralogical compositions in shales, the wettability of shales in different regions is very complicated. Clay minerals in shales, for instance, montmorillonite, illite, kaolinite, and chlorite, and nonclay minerals in shales, for instance, quartz, calcite, dolomite, and feldspar, are usually hydrophilic, while the organic matter in shales is usually lipophilic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generated gas is stored as free gas in 120 either intergranular porosity and fractures in shales, nanoporosity in kerogens that developedM A N U S C R I P T A C C E P T E D ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 6 during maturation, adsorbed onto the kerogen and clay particle surfaces, or absorbed in either 122 kerogen or bitumen (Bernard et Scotchman, 2015). 124 125 Unconventional shale gas resource systems are generally slightly to highly over-126 pressured (Jarvie, 2012), and the few published studies so far have used either open system 127 pyrolysis (Rock Eval and pyrolysis gas chromatography), or low pressure MSSV closed 128 system pyrolysis, to investigate gas generation and retention in shale gas resource systems 129 (Hartwig et al 2010;Mahlstedt and Horsfield, 2012;Slowakiewicz et al 2015). The 130 retention of gas in shales depends partly on the adsorption of the generated gas by the kerogen 131 and inorganic minerals (Williams, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shale gas has been emerging as a new potential energy resource in the world, especially in North America . The shale gas reservoirs generally exhibit some unique characteristics, which are quite different from those of the conventional reservoirs, such as extremely tight features, heterogeneity, etc. , The development of shale gas reservoirs thereby differs from that of the conventional ones in that it highly depends on the overall estimation of the geological, geochemical, or petrochemical properties of the shale gas reservoirs .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%