2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying analytic hierarchy process and failure likelihood index method (AHP-FLIM) to assess human reliability in critical and sensitive jobs of a petrochemical industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decision-makers compare the best criterion with other criteria (best-to-other) and the remaining ones with the worst criterion (other-to-worst) using importance scales as shown in Table 2 (more details on the importance scales, please see Zare et al [ 29 ], Orji et al [ 30 ], Gupta [ 31 ], and Koohathongsumrit and Luangpaiboon [ 32 ]). The best-to-other and other-to-worst vectors are respectively written as A BOd = { a B 1 d , a B 2 d , …, a Bmd } and A OWd = { a 1 Wd , a 2 Wd , …, a mWd }, where a Bjd is the importance scale of the best criterion over criterion j , evaluated by decision-maker d ; a jWd is the importance scale of criterion j over the worst criterion, evaluated by decision-maker d ; D is the number of decision-makers; a BBd = 1; a WWd = 1; j = 1, 2, …, m ; and d = 1, 2, …, D.…”
Section: Research Methods and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decision-makers compare the best criterion with other criteria (best-to-other) and the remaining ones with the worst criterion (other-to-worst) using importance scales as shown in Table 2 (more details on the importance scales, please see Zare et al [ 29 ], Orji et al [ 30 ], Gupta [ 31 ], and Koohathongsumrit and Luangpaiboon [ 32 ]). The best-to-other and other-to-worst vectors are respectively written as A BOd = { a B 1 d , a B 2 d , …, a Bmd } and A OWd = { a 1 Wd , a 2 Wd , …, a mWd }, where a Bjd is the importance scale of the best criterion over criterion j , evaluated by decision-maker d ; a jWd is the importance scale of criterion j over the worst criterion, evaluated by decision-maker d ; D is the number of decision-makers; a BBd = 1; a WWd = 1; j = 1, 2, …, m ; and d = 1, 2, …, D.…”
Section: Research Methods and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study employed the AHP model [ 28 ]. In this computational approach, all evaluation criteria were assigned equal importance in terms of weighting.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, they calculated the Failure Likelihood Index (FLI) for each of the identified human errors in the assigned works. Their findings indicated that the AHP‐FLI technique serves as a reasonable approach for evaluating human reliability in this context 35 . He et al.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Their findings indicated that the AHP-FLI technique serves as a reasonable approach for evaluating human reliability in this context. 35 He et al used CREAM to evaluate the probability of human reliability errors within a pharmaceutical corporation, assessing its applicability and reliability for broader use in HEP measures across various enterprises. 36 Morais et al implemented a machine learning (ML) algorithm to automate the categorization of accident reports linked to human errors.…”
Section: No No Nomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation