2021
DOI: 10.1177/00222194211047635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying an Individual Word-Problem Intervention to a Small-Group Setting: A Pilot Study’s Evidence of Improved Word-Problem Performance for Students Experiencing Mathematics Difficulty

Abstract: The purpose of this pilot study was to determine whether positive results from a word-problem intervention implemented one-to-one contributed to similar outcomes when implemented in small groups of three to four students. Third-grade students experiencing mathematics difficulty ( n = 76) were randomly assigned to word-problem intervention ( n = 56) or business-as-usual comparison ( n = 20). Intervention occurred for 13 weeks, 3 times per week, 30 min per session. Multilevel models revealed the intervention con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We provided intervention in groups of two to three students, whereas prior PMEQ studies provided individualized intervention (e.g., Powell, Berry, Fall et al 2021). Powell, Berry, Acunto et al (2021) found the effect size for PMEQ versus BAU instruction was larger for individualized intervention than for small group intervention (i.e., three to four students).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We provided intervention in groups of two to three students, whereas prior PMEQ studies provided individualized intervention (e.g., Powell, Berry, Fall et al 2021). Powell, Berry, Acunto et al (2021) found the effect size for PMEQ versus BAU instruction was larger for individualized intervention than for small group intervention (i.e., three to four students).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…We provided intervention in groups of two to three students, whereas prior PMEQ studies provided individualized intervention (e.g., . Powell, Berry, Acunto et al (2021) found the effect size for PMEQ versus BAU instruction was larger for individualized intervention than for small group intervention (i.e., three to four students). Due to the complexity of word-problem solving, we hypothesize that students were still in the initial stages of learning the schemas but required more opportunities for distributed, interleaved practice solving those schemas with targeted, individualized feedback.…”
Section: The Effects On Word-problem Solvingmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To address the second research question, we first conducted correlation analyses between TELPAS scores for language proficiency and students’ composite word‐problems scores at posttest for both intervention and BaU groups. Based on literature showing that difficulties experienced by emergent bilingual students with MD may be related to variability in students’ English‐language proficiency levels (Kong & Orosco, 2016; Leali et al., 2012; Powell et al., 2022; Solano‐Flores et al., 2013), we hypothesized that a relation might exist between students’ English‐language proficiency levels and word‐problem outcomes at posttest.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As evidenced by an abundance of research, students with MD show lower mathematics performance than students without MD on a variety of mathematical tasks, including those related to early numeracy (Clarke et al, 2021; Nelson & McMaster, 2019), computation (Grigorenko et al, 2020), fractions (Misquitta, 2011; Shin & Bryant, 2015), and algebra (Jayanthi et al, 2008). Moreover, students with MD also experience difficulty setting up and solving word problems (Powell et al, 2019). Challenges with the complexities of word–problem solving are exacerbated for students who are identified as emergent bilingual (Driver & Powell, 2017; Lei et al, 2020; Orosco & Abdulrahim, 2018; Swanson et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%