Applying a Yin–Yang Perspective to the Theory of Paradox: A Review of Chinese Management

Abstract

This paper examines the paradox in management through the yin–yang lens and how to apply the yin–yang perspective in Chinese indigenous management research through a literature review. Compared with several western philosophical perspectives, yin–yang places more emphasis on the interaction of interdependent contradictions and better describes the complex dynamics of both contradictions. Our review finds that the scholars propose yin–yang as a supplement to and an optimization of western management. The review focuses on connecting the yin–yang perspective with the paradox in management, cross-cultural management, and practice of organizational management.

What Could Highly Engaged Workers Gain From Mental Health Promotion Programs?

“…Yin and yang may represent two opposing aspects of a single object, such as the work engagement's low level and high level. Under conditions where consuming or supporting aspects exceed the average work engagement level, the relative balance will not be maintained, resulting in an excess or deficiency of either aspect and therefore the occurrence of turbulence and mental health problem 17 …”

“…Under conditions where consuming or supporting aspects exceed the average work engagement level, the relative balance will not be maintained, resulting in an excess or deficiency of either aspect and therefore the occurrence of turbulence and mental health problem. 17 Similarly, the TMGT proposed by Western researchers, assumes that excessive levels of beneficial antecedents may lead to undesirable outcomes. 15 Under their perspective, pursuing the moderate level was a moral as well as practical imperative.…”