2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.105937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying a random projection algorithm to optimize machine learning model for predicting peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer patients using CT images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies have proved that the precision, sensitivity and speci city of this model are 65.78%, 43.10% and 87.12%, respectively. However, one of the shortcomings of this study is that the sample size needs to be expanded [21]. Zhou et al used ve machine learning methods to establish a peritoneal metastasis model, and found that machine learning combining clinical indicators and serum markers could predict peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Studies have proved that the precision, sensitivity and speci city of this model are 65.78%, 43.10% and 87.12%, respectively. However, one of the shortcomings of this study is that the sample size needs to be expanded [21]. Zhou et al used ve machine learning methods to establish a peritoneal metastasis model, and found that machine learning combining clinical indicators and serum markers could predict peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Ultimately, the proposed model attained appropriate performance with 0.89% of AUC. Mirniaharikandehei et al 50 Hist gradient boosting ("verbose": 2, "random_state": 93, "n_estimators": 8, "max_leaf_nodes": 58, "max_iter": 130, "max_deph": 8, "learning rate": 0.1) 53.95 5 Decision tree (j48 ("random_state": 93, "min_sample_splits": 8, "min_sample_leaf": 1, "max_features": lpg2, "criteria": "Gini")…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultimately, the proposed model attained appropriate performance with 0.89% of AUC. Mirniaharikandehei et al 50 compared 5 gradients boosting machine (GBM) model performance for predicting gastric cancer metastatic risk and patient survivability. The results showed GBM technique combined with a random projection algorithm yielded significantly higher prediction performance (accuracy = 71.2%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu et al, followed an integrative approach of combining preoperative biomarkers including tissue biopsies, tumor markers, and CT image objects to predict lymph node metastasis in GEA by applying regression analysis and combined this to a multivariate model [ 161 ]. In parallel, similar image object information have been used to predict the risk of peritoneal metastases using gradient boosting machines [ 162 ]. Others applied DL models to detect metastasis using CT image objects, in addition to adequate staging [ 163 , 164 ].…”
Section: Machine Learning—basic Concepts Specific Applications and Future Directions In Geamentioning
confidence: 99%