Applying a random encounter model to estimate lion density from camera traps in Serengeti National Park, Tanzania

Abstract

The random encounter model (REM) is a novel method for estimating animal density from camera trap data without the need for individual recognition. It has never been used to estimate the density of large carnivore species, despite these being the focus of most camera trap studies worldwide. In this context, we applied the REM to estimate the density of female lions (Panthera leo) from camera traps implemented in Serengeti National Park, Tanzania, comparing estimates to reference values derived from pride census data. More specifically, we attempted to account for bias resulting from non-random camera placement at lion resting sites under isolated trees by comparing estimates derived from night versus day photographs, between dry and wet seasons, and between habitats that differ in their amount of tree cover. Overall, we recorded 169 and 163 independent photographic events of female lions from 7,608 and 12,137 camera trap days carried out in the dry season of 2010 and the wet season of 2011, respectively. Although all REM models considered over-estimated female lion density, models that considered only night-time events resulted in estimates that were much less biased relative to those based on all photographic events. We conclude that restricting REM estimation to periods and habitats in which animal movement is more likely to be random with respect to cameras can help reduce bias in estimates of density for female Serengeti lions. We highlight that accurate REM estimates will nonetheless be dependent on reliable measures of average speed of animal movement and camera detection zone dimensions. © 2015 The Authors. Journal of Wildlife Management published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Wildlife Society.

Estimating Lion Abundance using N-mixture Models for Social Species

“…Using random encounter models from remote camera imagery in a portion of our study area, Cusack et al 16. estimated 14.4 females/100 km 2 in grassland and 21.3 females/100 km 2 in woodland.…”

“…Numerous techniques have been developed to estimate abundance of lions including individual counts12, distance sampling13, mark-recapture14, call-in surveys15, camera surveys1617, and track counts18, with individual counts, call-in surveys, and track counts most commonly used. The accuracy and precision of survey techniques varies and their application has led to scientific debates [e.g.…”

Linking Earth Observation and taxonomic, structural and functional biodiversity: Local to ecosystem perspectives

“…for estimating lion density in the Serengeti National Park, Tanzania (Cusack et al, 2015). In this case, the animal is not caught physically, but only in a picture.…”

The wild life of tick-borne pathogens

“…So far, most studies using the REM used a proxy to estimate EDD, for example by moving in front of the camera themselves 185 , or by using a domesticated animal, such as a cat 183 . However, our results show that EDD scales with body mass.…”