2021
DOI: 10.18865/ed.31.s1.375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying a Race(ism)-Conscious Adaptation of the CFIR Framework to Understand Implementation of a School-Based Equity-Oriented Intervention

Abstract: Objectives: To use the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) adapted to a race-conscious frame to understand ways that structural racism interacts with intervention implementation and uptake within an equity-oriented trial designed to enhance student-school con­nectedness.Design: Secondary analysis of qualitative implementation data from Project TRUST (Training for Resiliency in Urban Students and Teachers), a hybrid effectiveness-imple­mentation, community-based participatory intervention.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the updated CFIR includes new constructs to better assess determinants related to equity in implementation, we urge users to collaborate with equity experts [ 99 ] to combine use of equity, justice, or non-discrimination theories with the CFIR as a lens through which to view all facets of implementation [ 100 ]. For example, Allen et al adapted the CFIR using the Public Health Critical Race Praxis to understand the ways structural racism influence implementation of an equity program across all constructs [ 101 ]. Researchers have produced decades of findings focused on the role of individual (e.g., race) and structural (e.g., access to care) determinants of health in highlighting inequities in services and outcomes [ 102 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the updated CFIR includes new constructs to better assess determinants related to equity in implementation, we urge users to collaborate with equity experts [ 99 ] to combine use of equity, justice, or non-discrimination theories with the CFIR as a lens through which to view all facets of implementation [ 100 ]. For example, Allen et al adapted the CFIR using the Public Health Critical Race Praxis to understand the ways structural racism influence implementation of an equity program across all constructs [ 101 ]. Researchers have produced decades of findings focused on the role of individual (e.g., race) and structural (e.g., access to care) determinants of health in highlighting inequities in services and outcomes [ 102 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deeper application and evolution of methods from other adjacent fields applied to implementation are opportunities to harness well-vetted theory, advance our science, and increase rigor and impact, particularly in promoting health equity. For example, we have seen recent innovations in adapting existing theories, models, and frameworks to focus more on equity (e.g., see [23,[49][50][51]). We note opportunities to learn from and integrate theories and frameworks from fields with a long history of health equity scholarship, including anthropology, sociology, and public health [52].…”
Section: Opportunitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focando a produção de conhecimento, conceitualização e medidas, o uso do CFIR, além de dar informações sobre as barreiras na implementação de políticas por meio da análise de seus constructos, pode também ser avaliado dentro da metodologia PHCR, na tentativa de se elucidar as maneiras pelas quais o racismo estrutural interage com as implementações de intervenções voltadas para a equidade 47 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified