2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.05.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying a network level in environmental impact assessments

Abstract: AcknowledgementsThe authors thank the special issue editors and the two anonymous reviewers for their valuable and constructive comments on the paper. The authors express their gratitude to Bengt Högberg, Linköping University for his support and helpful remarks on the final version of the paper. 2 AbstractResearchers and society devote increasing interest to environmental impact assessments. The study here discusses and questions current assessment models by relating them to inter-organizational network analys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The shippers' customers are only indirectly related to the LSPs, but their influence on the degreening in the network is evident. This supports taking a network perspective when studying business relationships (Håkansson and Snehota, 1995), and further highlights the importance of taking a wider perspective than single companies or relationships in the analysis of environmental or sustainability contexts as identified by several researchers (Björklund et al, 2012;Johnsen et al, 2017;Öberg et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The shippers' customers are only indirectly related to the LSPs, but their influence on the degreening in the network is evident. This supports taking a network perspective when studying business relationships (Håkansson and Snehota, 1995), and further highlights the importance of taking a wider perspective than single companies or relationships in the analysis of environmental or sustainability contexts as identified by several researchers (Björklund et al, 2012;Johnsen et al, 2017;Öberg et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…An ongoing trend within sustainability logistics is to widen the scope from a traditional company internal focus to include upstream and/or downstream actors (see e.g., [51][52][53]). In line with this, the scope in measuring has also broaden [54,55]. Isaksson et al [21] put forward the lack of knowledge regarding the integration beyond organizational boundaries in the performance management in general as well as within sustainable supply chain management.…”
Section: Roles and Perspectives Of The Actors Involvedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite recognition that environmental and social outcomes play a critical role not only in advancing competitiveness but also in sustaining societal well-being and quality of life, they are rarely included in managerial evaluations and calculations of value, at least in a meaningful way (cf. Öberg, Huge-Brodin & Björklund, 2012; Polonsky, 2011). To address this issue, this article makes two contributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%