2015
DOI: 10.1117/12.2188207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying a microfacet model to polarized light scattering measurements of the Earth's surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, if the illumination polarization is known, the extension of the analysis to this case is relatively straightforward. We note that the fourth Stokes component, corresponding to the circular polarization state, is not measured by the Ground-MSPI due to its insignificant contribution in most natural scenes [1][2]4,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, if the illumination polarization is known, the extension of the analysis to this case is relatively straightforward. We note that the fourth Stokes component, corresponding to the circular polarization state, is not measured by the Ground-MSPI due to its insignificant contribution in most natural scenes [1][2]4,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For clear sky conditions, the direct illumination generally dominates unless the Sun is low in the sky. Thus, in this work, as well as other passive remote sensing studies [1,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22], the scene illumination is considered to be unpolarized. This assumption may not be accurate for certain conditions such as a partly cloudy sky or for relatively smooth surfaces that produce significant specular reflections of the partially polarized sky irradiance.…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations