2019
DOI: 10.1111/acv.12553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apply our best model inferences now

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With this in mind, we offer some additional thoughts resulting from the commentaries of Mindell and Faith. We agree with Mindell (2019) that our simulations use simple (homogeneous) models of diversification, and that models where diversification rates can vary within a phylogeny (heterogeneous models) may provide more realistic phylogenies. Mindell (2019) kindly mounts an argument on our behalf, pointing out that simulations based on more complex models can introduce unintended biases (and, we suggest, have less general results). Such models also have more parameters whose estimation introduces additional error, and so our approach of simulating and imputing under the same model represents a best-case scenario for successful imputation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…With this in mind, we offer some additional thoughts resulting from the commentaries of Mindell and Faith. We agree with Mindell (2019) that our simulations use simple (homogeneous) models of diversification, and that models where diversification rates can vary within a phylogeny (heterogeneous models) may provide more realistic phylogenies. Mindell (2019) kindly mounts an argument on our behalf, pointing out that simulations based on more complex models can introduce unintended biases (and, we suggest, have less general results). Such models also have more parameters whose estimation introduces additional error, and so our approach of simulating and imputing under the same model represents a best-case scenario for successful imputation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We thank Faith () and Mindell () for their insightful perspectives on our study of the impact of phylogenetic imputation on the assessment of evolutionary distinctiveness (ED; Isaac et al , ). As Mindell highlights, the finding that ED scores for species on a phylogeny are remarkably robust despite having species missing from that phylogeny is encouraging; our results suggest that we can be confident in moving forward with prioritization of the species for which we have data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations