2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.11.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applied p-median and p-center algorithms for facility location problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
31
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The multi-criteria/objective facility location problem (MCFLP/MOFLP) for infectious waste disposal in this case is one the MCDM problem. A group of researchers (Dantrakul et al, 2014;Guo, Cheng, & Wang, 2017;Kalcsics, Nickel, Pozo, Puerto, & Rodríguez-Chía, 2014;Steiner, Datta, Steiner Neto, Scarpin, & Rui Figueira, 2015) proposed mathematical techniques to solve MCDM problems which need to deal with environmental restrictions, whereas another group (Choudhary & Shankar, 2012;Hanine et al, 2016;Kahraman et al, 2003) often proposed MCDM tools to solve complex problems which are difficult to interpret. The disadvantages of MCDM tools alone cause them to be unable to handle existing environmental restrictions in some special problems, and the disadvantages of mathematical techniques make them unable to address complex problems which are difficult to interpret.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The multi-criteria/objective facility location problem (MCFLP/MOFLP) for infectious waste disposal in this case is one the MCDM problem. A group of researchers (Dantrakul et al, 2014;Guo, Cheng, & Wang, 2017;Kalcsics, Nickel, Pozo, Puerto, & Rodríguez-Chía, 2014;Steiner, Datta, Steiner Neto, Scarpin, & Rui Figueira, 2015) proposed mathematical techniques to solve MCDM problems which need to deal with environmental restrictions, whereas another group (Choudhary & Shankar, 2012;Hanine et al, 2016;Kahraman et al, 2003) often proposed MCDM tools to solve complex problems which are difficult to interpret. The disadvantages of MCDM tools alone cause them to be unable to handle existing environmental restrictions in some special problems, and the disadvantages of mathematical techniques make them unable to address complex problems which are difficult to interpret.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The location network (depots, customers and arcs) that incurs the minimum total distance/lowest total cost is regarded as an optimal solution. Many researchers (Dantrakul et al, 2014;Etemadnia et al, 2015;Guastaroba & Speranza, 2014;Rahmani & MirHassani, 2014) have proposed solving techniques such as mathematical techniques (heuristic and optimization techniques) only. However, with some complex problems such as selecting sites for hazardous material waste disposal, choosing sites for nuclear power plants, location selection for infectious waste disposal, these problems are very important decisions because they are costly and hard to reverse.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differently, in P-median problems (p-MP) the decision maker aims to allocate p facilities in such a way that total distance traveled between demand points and facilities is minimized. Dantrakul et al (2014) apply median and center model to allocate waste system facilities in Chiang Mai city and 5 provinces of Northern Thailand. As emergency systems facility location problem applications, Jia et al (2007) utilize both covering, center and median models for allocating medical supply storage to distribute antibiotics, vaccines and drugs rapidly under a possible chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) terrorist attack in LA.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CPMP problem is NP-complete according to the proof of [11], so its generalization BMCLP is too. Several other variants of CPMP are treated by [18], [3], [1] and [7]. Dynamic location problems are solved by [2], [8] and [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%