1997
DOI: 10.1007/bf02537369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applied microfacies analysis: Provenance studies of Roman mosaic stones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In short, we have highlighted the areas where it is possible to obtain rocks from which such tesserae could be made. Additionally, we used provenance criteria for local, regional and imported material as defined by Flügel and Flügel (); that is, a 10 km radius for local and a 40 km radius for regional provenance. Outcrops of matching formations located farther than 40 km from the mosaic sites are considered here as imported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In short, we have highlighted the areas where it is possible to obtain rocks from which such tesserae could be made. Additionally, we used provenance criteria for local, regional and imported material as defined by Flügel and Flügel (); that is, a 10 km radius for local and a 40 km radius for regional provenance. Outcrops of matching formations located farther than 40 km from the mosaic sites are considered here as imported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fact that the most common and important material for tesserae is limestone (cf., Fiori et al ), studies of the microfacies, geochemistry and provenance of limestone tesserae are extremely rare (Flügel and Flügel ; Flügel ; Capedri et al ; Dekayir et al ; Wilkinson et al ; Tasker et al ). The work of Flügel and Flügel () stands out as the first paper to use comprehensive microfacies analysis of limestone tesserae used in Roman mosaics from southern Germany, Austria, Italy and Tunisia in order to elucidate their local versus regional origin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Neal 2006, 2010;Cosh 2002, 2009 2 For example, Rainey, 1973;Johnson, 1987;and more recently, Ling 1997;Witts 20053 Smith 1969Johnson 19874 Wilkinson et al 20085 Tasker et al 2011 For example, by Cosh 2002, 69. 7 Flügel andFlügel 1997;Flügel 1999, 20048 Allen and Fulford 2004Allen et al 20079 Hayward 200910 Wilkinson et al 2008Tasker et al 2011 11 Flügel 1999 12 Flügel and Flügel, 1997 13 Clay and Pollard, 1994, 46 22 Mattingly 2007, 140-1 23 Cooper 2006, 147;Higgins et al 2009, 3 24 Johnson 1980 25 Connor and Buckley 1999 26 Higgins et al 200927 Johnson 1980Higgins et al 2009 28 Cosh 2002, 110-115 29 Neal andCosh 2002, 123, 127 30 Archaeological context numbers for the locations of the redeposited tesserae and the Small Find 1084 are given in Tables 2-5. These can be related to the relevant context descriptions in Higgins et al 2009.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along with its sensitivity to the variation in chemical composition of carbonates, it also facilitates distinction of fossil fragments that are not visible by conventional microscopy. This contributes to separation of marbles by microfacial analysis, a technique proposed for provenance studies by Flügel and Flügel (1997).…”
Section: Cathodomicrofaciesmentioning
confidence: 99%