2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2006.tb02252.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applied Literacy in Second Language Education: (Re) Framing Discourse in Literature‐Based Classrooms

Abstract: The present investigation explores and presents a theoretical model of instruction—applied literacy in second language education (ALL2E)—and suggests a contemporary view of the roles of grammar and formal evaluation within literature‐based second language (L2) classrooms. Essentially, this article addresses the question “How can instruction and discourse in this setting he framed in order to provide opportunities for language learning and cognitive development for its participants?” Research in the area of lit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Just as study abroad cannot guarantee engagement with the TL and the TL culture, neither can it be assumed that students will continue to progress in their speaking skills when their courses shift from those that focus on language skill development to those that focus on literature and culture (Swaffar, ). Research on student discourse in upper‐division literature courses (e.g., Brooks & Donato, ; Mantero, ; Polio & Zyzik, ) has shown that students do not often engage in either the type or amount of speaking that will enable them to progress beyond the Intermediate level. For example, in their analysis of discussions of literary texts in an upper‐level undergraduate Spanish literature class, Donato and Brooks () discovered that the instructor's questions had one right answer only and enabled her to take the floor in the discussion rather than the students, the classroom discourse pattern did not encourage students to respond beyond the word and sentence level, and the range of time frames used in discussions was limited mostly to the present.…”
Section: Achieving Advanced‐level Proficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Just as study abroad cannot guarantee engagement with the TL and the TL culture, neither can it be assumed that students will continue to progress in their speaking skills when their courses shift from those that focus on language skill development to those that focus on literature and culture (Swaffar, ). Research on student discourse in upper‐division literature courses (e.g., Brooks & Donato, ; Mantero, ; Polio & Zyzik, ) has shown that students do not often engage in either the type or amount of speaking that will enable them to progress beyond the Intermediate level. For example, in their analysis of discussions of literary texts in an upper‐level undergraduate Spanish literature class, Donato and Brooks () discovered that the instructor's questions had one right answer only and enabled her to take the floor in the discussion rather than the students, the classroom discourse pattern did not encourage students to respond beyond the word and sentence level, and the range of time frames used in discussions was limited mostly to the present.…”
Section: Achieving Advanced‐level Proficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a similar vein, Mantero (, ) examined text‐centered talk in a third‐year introductory Hispanic literature course. Mantero's analyses revealed patterns of discourse that were very similar to the IREs of the Donato and Brooks () study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second literacy‐based model, applied literacy in second language education (ALL2E), responded to the following question: “How can instruction and discourse in [second language classrooms] be framed in order to provide opportunities for language learning and cognitive development for its participants?” (Mantero, , p. 99). In developing the model, Mantero focused specifically on literature‐based classrooms and the role of grammar and formal evaluation within them.…”
Section: Implementing Curricular Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%