1990
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781139167932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applied Geophysics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

41
1,537
1
331

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,104 publications
(2,177 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
41
1,537
1
331
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a bowl-shaped, low resistivity (<50 ohm-m) unit in the wetland with a maximum thickness of about 5 m that tapers out toward the edges of the wetland area. The resistivity of this unit is typical of clay (<100 ohm-m), which corresponds well with the interbedded clays, silts, and peat logged in boreholes MW02-04 and CGW1 (Telford & Sheri↵, 1990). There appears to be a more resistive unit extending from electrode 48 at the surface down and to the west that corresponds to the layer of sand and gravel (80-120 ohm-m) seen in MW02 and GW05 (Telford & Sheri↵, 1990).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is a bowl-shaped, low resistivity (<50 ohm-m) unit in the wetland with a maximum thickness of about 5 m that tapers out toward the edges of the wetland area. The resistivity of this unit is typical of clay (<100 ohm-m), which corresponds well with the interbedded clays, silts, and peat logged in boreholes MW02-04 and CGW1 (Telford & Sheri↵, 1990). There appears to be a more resistive unit extending from electrode 48 at the surface down and to the west that corresponds to the layer of sand and gravel (80-120 ohm-m) seen in MW02 and GW05 (Telford & Sheri↵, 1990).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The resistivity of this unit is typical of clay (<100 ohm-m), which corresponds well with the interbedded clays, silts, and peat logged in boreholes MW02-04 and CGW1 (Telford & Sheri↵, 1990). There appears to be a more resistive unit extending from electrode 48 at the surface down and to the west that corresponds to the layer of sand and gravel (80-120 ohm-m) seen in MW02 and GW05 (Telford & Sheri↵, 1990). Below the sand layer, resistivity increases to about 700 ohm-m, typical of the granite bedrock observed in the bottom of MW02, though this depth is near the resolution limit of this study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…In this paper, we selected three models to represent possible geological configurations. Table 1 summarises the possible permittivity, conductivity, and permeability ranges of these geological formation [2][3]. In Table 2, we identify a "spread" factor that quantifies the wideness of each physical parameter for each layer around the average.…”
Section: The Forward Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In honor of Galilei, the unit of gravity field is called Gal=0.01 m/s 2 . However, because of small variations of gravity fields caused by local masses and the sensitivity of gravimeters used in the field measurements, mGal=10 -3 Gal is adopted as unit of gravity field (Telford et al, 1990). In order to interpret short wavelength gravity anomalies caused by local masses with positive or negative density contrasts, a key step should be carried out to separate regional field from the anomaly caused by the target source prior to analysis of measured gravity field.…”
Section: Regional Gravity Field and Gravity Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Readers are referred to text books e.g. Telford et al (1990) and Blakely (1995) for details about gravity data corrections.…”
Section: Regional Gravity Field and Gravity Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%