Applications of the matching law to observe shifts in problem behavior: A proof‐of‐concept study

Abstract

We used the matching law to quantify the relation between the relative likelihood of appropriate behavior and problem behavior and the relative likelihood of parent-delivered reinforcement for those behaviors. First, we conducted an initial descriptive observation in the dyads' homes. Second, we assessed the problem behavior within a clinic where participants were receiving behavior-analytic services.Third, using behavioral skills training (BST), we taught parents how to implement treatments based on differential reinforcement. Fourth, we conducted a second descriptive observation in the dyads' home. Last, we used the generalized matching law to quantify the relation between the child's response allocation and parent-delivered reinforcement before and after BST. The relation between the effects of parent-delivered reinforcement on the relative likelihood of appropriate and problem behavior was well described by the matching law.

The matching law provides a quantitative description of social time allocation in children with autism

“…The matching law is one quantitative model of behavior that has been demonstrated to provide a good description of many applied phenomena such as problem behavior (Borrero et al, 2010; Borrero & Vollmer, 2002; Kronfli et al, 2021; McDowell, 1982, 1988) and response allocation in sports (Alferink et al, 2009; Cero & Falligant, 2019; Cox et al, 2021; Cox et al, 2017; Reed et al, 2006; Romanowich et al, 2007; Rotta et al, 2020; Vollmer & Bourret, 2000). The matching law has also been applied to social behavior such as conversation (Borrero et al, 2007; Conger & Killeen, 1974; McDowell & Caron, 2010; Pierce et al, 1981).…”