2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2015.08.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applications of the Funk–Hecke theorem to smoothing and trace estimates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(this latter paper also addresses the Hölder continuity of the trace and its behaviour for small values of r ). Our Theorem 3.1 partly overlaps with [, Theorem 1.4] and [, pp. 1779, 1792].…”
Section: Trace Theorems With Explicit Uniform Boundsmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…(this latter paper also addresses the Hölder continuity of the trace and its behaviour for small values of r ). Our Theorem 3.1 partly overlaps with [, Theorem 1.4] and [, pp. 1779, 1792].…”
Section: Trace Theorems With Explicit Uniform Boundsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…In particular it does not rely on assumptions on the Fourier transform of 1/μ. Some overlap with previous results, notably in and , is addressed in Remark . Our wish to find a uniform resolvent estimate for the free Dirac operators with mass m0 in any dimensions n2 motivated us to replace the weight primarily employed in such estimates, 1μ(τ)=()1+τ2sfalse(τ0;0.33ems>1/2false),(note that μ is the weight in the inhomogeneous Sobolev space Hsfalse(boldRnfalse) and that the Fourier transform of 1/μ is the Bessel potential of order s ), by the function 1μ(τ)=τ2t1+τ2sfalse(τ>0;0.33em0t<1/2,0.33emt+s>1/2false).It will be essential to have an explicit bound on the trace that does not depend on the radius r of the sphere; moreover one needs to know that the trace tends to zero as r tends to zero [Remark 3.3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations