2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3572-7_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applications of Protein Thermodynamic Database for Understanding Protein Mutant Stability and Designing Stable Mutants

Abstract: Protein stability is the free energy difference between unfolded and folded states of a protein, which lies in the range of 5-25 kcal/mol. Experimentally, protein stability is measured with circular dichroism, differential scanning calorimetry, and fluorescence spectroscopy using thermal and denaturant denaturation methods. These experimental data have been accumulated in the form of a database, ProTherm, thermodynamic database for proteins and mutants. It also contains sequence and structure information of a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The algorithms are better at predicting deletion mutations in the hydrophobic core, than mutations that increase the size of the side chain, mutations on the protein surface and mutations where electrostatic interactions contribute to the stabilization. This is partly a result of the data available for training the algorithms that mainly consist of deletion mutations in the hydrophobic core 26 , A particular challenge in predicting stabilizing protein variants is that among the few single substitutions that are actually stabilizing the effects are often small, so that multiple substitutions may be needed to create a substantial stabilizing effect 17 . As the effects of the mutations are not always independent, and non-additivity may result in both positive or negative epistasis 27 , 28 , it can be difficult to predict the stability of proteins with multiple substitutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithms are better at predicting deletion mutations in the hydrophobic core, than mutations that increase the size of the side chain, mutations on the protein surface and mutations where electrostatic interactions contribute to the stabilization. This is partly a result of the data available for training the algorithms that mainly consist of deletion mutations in the hydrophobic core 26 , A particular challenge in predicting stabilizing protein variants is that among the few single substitutions that are actually stabilizing the effects are often small, so that multiple substitutions may be needed to create a substantial stabilizing effect 17 . As the effects of the mutations are not always independent, and non-additivity may result in both positive or negative epistasis 27 , 28 , it can be difficult to predict the stability of proteins with multiple substitutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithms are better at predicting deletion mutations in the hydrophobic core, than mutations that increase the size of the side chain, mutations on the protein surface and mutations where electrostatic interactions contribute to the stabilization. This is partly a result of the data available for training the algorithms that mainly consist of deletion mutations in the hydrophobic core (Gromiha et al, 2016). A particular challenge in predicting stabilizing protein variants is that among the few single substitutions that are actually stabilizing the effects are often small, so that multiple substitutions may be needed to create a substantial stabilizing effect (Goldenzweig et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 7 , 30 , 31 Let us provide some pieces of evidence that support this important conjecture. The proteins’ free energy of unfolding (Δ G U ) spans a wide range of variations, viz., between 5 and 25 kcal/mol, 32 revealing the complexity of the “protein folding problem”. 14 , 33 35 However, its range of variation upon point mutations (ΔΔ G U ) is small and well-defined, revealing the validity of the thermodynamic hypothesis or Anfinsen dogma, 14 as explained next.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%