The aim of this study was to evaluate skidding techniques, which result in minimal damage to the soil, depending on the slope and stand type. Thus, three skidding techniques with tractor for harvesting (suspended skidding [SS], using a skidding cone [SC], and cable-pulling [CP]) were used in six different study sites and the variations in soil properties were examined at three different slopes (0%–20%, 20%–33%, >33%), 2 different stand types (A, B), and 2 different soil depths (0–5 cm, 5–10 cm). Soil bulk density, soil organic matter, soil compaction, organic carbon (C), and total nitrogen (N) were determined. The Entropy and TOPSIS methods were used among the multiple-criteria decision-making methods for six different coniferous stands.
With the combination of the Entropy and TOPSIS methods, we found that slope was an important factor in determining the preferred skidding technique. Suspended skidding was seen as the preferred method of skidding technique in the 0–20% slope group. For the 20%–33% slope group, the usability of the three methods varied depending on stand type and soil depth, whereas the technique using a skidding cone was found to be the preferred skidding technique in the > 33% slope group.
Study Implications Sustainable forest management can be ensured by managing forests in consideration of ecological, economic, and social dimensions. For these reasons, forests can be used efficiently for the long term with the identification of the most appropriate operation and harvesting techniques. Logging operations, used for harvesting by the forestry sector, is the management of a biological asset that is open to natural conditions and dependent on the soil and causes several impacts on forest soil structure. The damage leads to negative consequences for sustainability and productivity of the forest ecosystem. This study demonstrated that it is possible to reduce soil damage by using the most preferred or ideal site-specific skidding technique.