2011
DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2010.269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applications of nutrient profiling: potential role in diet-related chronic disease prevention and the feasibility of a core nutrient-profiling system

Abstract: There is substantial scope to use nutrient profiling as part of the policies for the prevention of DRCD. A core nutrient-profiling system underpinning the various applications is likely to reduce discrepancies and minimise the confusion for regulators, manufacturers and consumers. It seems feasible that common elements, such as a standard scoring method, a core set of nutrients and food components, and defined food categories, could be incorporated as part of a core system, with additional application-specific… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the use of both of these methods can assist with the classification of some of the more ambiguous discretionary foods. As with all methods used to assess the nutritional quality of individual food products, both the NPSC and core food methods are imperfect as they do not take into consideration the serving sizes, frequency or specific patterns of consumption …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the use of both of these methods can assist with the classification of some of the more ambiguous discretionary foods. As with all methods used to assess the nutritional quality of individual food products, both the NPSC and core food methods are imperfect as they do not take into consideration the serving sizes, frequency or specific patterns of consumption …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The broader the categorization system used to set prices, the less of a concern that participants will be able to substitute with similar less healthy products. This is particularly relevant as the science of nutrient profiling is being developed (56)(57)(58)(59)(60)(61), which may provide a better basis for pricing foods than price changes on narrow categories of food, such as sugarsweetened beverages. Research comparing selective targeting of price changes of specific foods compared with broader, nutrient-profiling-based approaches is warranted in future research.…”
Section: Effect Of Price Changes On Substitution Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are environmental relationships also to be considered (Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, 2007); however, the major battle about food vs processed food is not pursued further here (Ludwig and Nestle, 2008; Monteiro and Cannon, 2012; Monteiro et al, 2010; Monteiro et al, 2011; Monteiro et al, 2013; Nestle, 2007a, b; Pollan, 2006a; Pollan, 2006b, 2010; Woolf and Nestle, 2008) though elements of this affect weight gain, obesity and all other major noncommunicable diseases (Mozaffarian et al, 2011; Mozaffarian D, 2010; Willett, 2001; Willett, 2006). This side battle focuses the food only push vs those who focus on improving the quality of what is already purchased (Rayner et al, 2013; Roodenburg et al, 2011; Sacks et al, 2011; Wartella et al, 2010). There are major critiques of this approach (Brownell and Koplan, 2011; Nestle and Ludwig, 2010).…”
Section: The Perspectives Within the Nutrition Communitymentioning
confidence: 99%