Background Accurate preprocedural measurements is important for left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). However, there were limited data comparing tomography angiography (CTA), trans-esophageal echocardiography (TEE) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for diagnostic accuracy and the utility for LAAC. This study aimed to compare the results of CTA, TEE and DSA measurements and analyze their accuracy, correlation and consistency in patients who successfully underwent LAAC.Methods 157 non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who underwent LAAC were included. The maximum diameter and depth of LAA were recorded by CTA, TEE and DSA. Correlations and agreements were compared. Results All patients were successfully performed LAAC with Watchman device. There was no significant difference in the diameter measurement of LAA ostium between DSA and TEE. Meanwhile, The diameter of LAA ostium obtained by CTA was greater than that of DSA and TEE. There were good correlations between the LAA ostium measured by TEE, CTA, DSA and the Watchman device. DSA measurements and the actual device size were the widest limits of agreement, followed by TEE, CTA measurements were the narrowest limits of agreement. For the LAA depth measurements, mean CTA measurements was higher than that of TEE and DSA. There was no significant difference in the depth measurement among the three imaging modalities. Conclusions CTA, TEE and DSA measurements had good correlations with WATCHMAN device. The ostium diameter and depth of the LAA measured by CTA were greater than those measured by TEE and DSA. The relevance and concordance of CTA measurements were the best.